SF3B1-mutant mis-splicing of UBA1 confers a targetable therapeutic vulnerability through UBA1 inhibition
Thier, J.; Hofmann, S.; Kirchhof, K.; Todisco, G.; Mortera-Blanco, T.; Barbosa, I.; Björklund, A.-C.; Deslauriers, A. G.; Papaemmanuil, E.; Papapetrou, E. P.; Hellström-Lindberg, E.; Moura, P. L.; Lundin, V.
Show abstract
SF3B1 mutation-driven myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS-SF3B1) arise due to somatic mutation in the splicing factor SF3B1 gene. SF3B1 mutations induce RNA mis-splicing and loss of expression of critical genes for erythropoiesis, leading to erythroid dysplasia and ultimately refractory anemia. The development of precision medicine approaches for MDS- SF3B1 is hampered by the complexity of the mis-splicing landscape and its evaluation in disease-accurate model systems. To identify novel RNA mis-splicing events, isogenic SF3B1K700E and SF3B1WT iPSC lines from an MDS-SF3B1 patient were differentiated into hematopoietic cells in vitro and subjected to unsupervised splicing event analysis using full-length RNA sequencing data. This revealed SF3B1K700E-specific mis-splicing of ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme 1 (UBA1) transcripts, which encode the essential E1 protein at the apex of the ubiquitination cascade. UBA1 mis-splicing (UBA1ms) preserved UBA1ms mRNA but not protein expression. Consequently, UBA1ms diminished the pool of functional UBA1, sensitizing SF3B1K700E cell lines to the small-molecule UBA1 inhibitor TAK-243. Finally, analysis of CD34+ RNA sequencing data from an MDS patient cohort confirmed unique and ubiquitous UBA1ms in MDS-SF3B1 patients, without detection in other splicing factor-mutated MDS patients, or in healthy individuals. TAK-243 selectively targeted MDS-SF3B1 primary CD34+ cells and reduced mutant cell number in colony-forming unit studies. In contrast, normal hematopoietic progenitor cells were unaffected. Altogether, we here define UBA1ms as a novel therapeutic vulnerability in SF3B1-mutant cells, introducing UBA1 inhibition as a potential avenue for future MDS-SF3B1 treatments.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mutant-SETBP1 activates transcription of Myc programs to accelerate CSF3R-driven myeloproliferative neoplasms 97%
- Nintedanib Targets KIT D816V Neoplastic Cells Derived from Induced Pluripotent Stem cells of Systemic Mastocytosis 95%
- CXCL8/CXCR2 signaling mediates bone marrow fibrosis and represents a therapeutic target in myelofibrosis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- ANKRD26 is a new regulator of type I cytokine receptor signaling in normal and pathological hematopoiesis 96%
- Loss of Nupr1 promotes engraftment by tuning the quiescence threshold of hematopoietic stem cell repository via regulating p53-checkpoint pathway 94%
- The STAT3-VDAC1 Axis Modulates Mitochondrial Function and Plays a Critical Role in the Survival of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adenine base editing is an efficient approach to restore function in FA patient cells without double-stranded DNA breaks 96%
- A heterozygous CEBPA mutation disrupting the bZIP domain causes MDS disease progression 96%
- CDKN1A is a target for phagocytosis-mediated cellular immunotherapy in acute leukemia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lfc/Arhgef2 regulates mitotic spindle orientation in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and is essential for productive hematopoiesis 96%
- Genetically Corrected RAG2-SCID Human Hematopoietic Stem CellsRestore V(D)J-Recombinase and Rescue Lymphoid Deficiency 95%
- Molecular mechanisms promoting long-term cytopenia after BCMA CAR-T therapy in Multiple Myeloma 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mesenchymal stem cells suppress leukemia via macrophage-mediated functional restoration of bone marrow microenvironment 95%
- Mutant SETBP1 enhances NRAS-driven MAPK pathway activation to promote aggressive leukemia 95%
- Resistance to decitabine and 5-azacytidine emerges from adaptive responses of the pyrimidine metabolism network 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.