Colonisation lags predict sympatric diversity in birds
Reijenga, B. R.; Etienne, R. S.; Murrell, D. J.; Pigot, A. L.
Show abstract
Speciation is the ultimate source of biodiversity. However, because most species arise in spatial isolation (allopatry), how speciation shapes patterns of co-occurring (sympatry) species richness remains unclear. Here we examine how the history of past speciation events influences the maximum sympatric species richness attained across passerine bird clades (n = 40 families). Using a phylogenetic model, we infer that the rate at which species assemble in sympatry is extremely slow, and on average millions of years after speciation onset. As a result, having accounted for clade size, sympatric species richness varies substantially across families, being highest in small or ancient clades comprised of older species that have had more time to accumulate in sympatry. While our analysis does not test the ecological or evolutionary processes causing the slow build-up of sympatric assemblages, our results show that speciation history has left an indelible legacy on current species richness patterns.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The latitudinal gradient in rates of evolution for bird beaks, a species interaction trait 95%
- A probabilistic view of forbidden links: their prevalence and their consequences for the robustness of plant-hummingbird communities 94%
- Global plant-frugivore trait matching is shaped by climate and biogeographic history 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The geography of metacommunities: landscape characteristics drive geographic variation in the assembly process through selecting species pool attributes 93%
- The equilibrium theory of biodiversity dynamics: a general framework for scaling species richness and community abundance along environmental gradients 93%
- Priority effects determine how dispersal affects biodiversity in seasonal metacommunities 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.