Back

A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Multi-Centre, Phase Iii Study Of Mlc901 (Neuroaid Iitm) For The Treatment Of Cognitive Impairment After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Pavel, P.; Ivanova, A.; Kotsubinskaya, J.; Grigoryeva, V.; Khrulev, A.; Skorokhodov, A.; Gavrik, M.; Majdan, M.; Valkovic, P.; Babarova, D.; Barker-Collo, S.; Jones, K.; Feigin, V. L.

2024-08-29 neurology
10.1101/2024.08.28.24312757
Show abstract

IntroductionAbout half of the world population will suffer from a traumatic brain injury (TBI) during their lifetime, of which about 90% of cases are mild TBI. About 15-40% of adults with TBI experience persistent cognitive deficits, and there is a lack of proven-effective treatment to facilitate cognitive recovery after mild TBI. Methods and analysisThis randomized placebo-controlled multi-centre clinical trial aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of herbal supplement MLC901 (NeuroAiD II) on cognitive functioning following mild TBI. Adults aged 18-65 years, who were 1-12-months post-mild TBI and experienced cognitive impairment, were assigned to receive either MLC901 (0.8g capsules/day) or placebo for 6 months in 7 research centres in Russia using centralized stratified permuted block randomization. The primary outcome was cognitive functioning as assessed by an online neuropsychological test (CNS Vital signs). Secondary outcomes included Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ; neurobehavioral sequelae), Health Related Quality of Life (QOLIBRI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and adverse events. Assessments were completed at baseline and 3-, 6-, and 9-month follow-ups. Mixed effects models of repeated measures with intention to treat analysis were employed, with the primary outcome time-point of 6-months. A Least Square Mean Difference (LSMD) from baseline to 3-, 6-, and 9-month follow-up was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). ResultsOne hundred and eighty-two participants (mean age 40.6{+/-}14.2 in the MLC901 group and 40.1{+/-}12.0 in the Placebo group, 50% and 47.8% females, respectively) were included in the analysis. Baseline variables were comparable between groups. Multivariate mixed effects model analysis did not reveal significant improvements in complex attention (LSMD=-1.18 [95% CI -5.40; 3.03; p=0.58] and other cognitive domains at 6-months in the MLC901 group compared to the Placebo group. There were significant improvements in RPQ, QOLIBRI, anxiety and depression in the MLC901 group compared to the Placebo group at 6 and 9-months (LSMD -4.36 [-6.46; -2.26] and -4.07 [-6.22; -1.92], 4.84 [1.58; 8.10] and 3.74 [0.44; 7.03], -1.50 [-2.29; -0.71 and -0.96 [-1.84; -0.08], -1.14 [-1.92; -0.35] and -1.14 [-1.94; -0.34], respectively. No serious adverse events were reported. ConclusionsThe 6-month treatment with MLC901 did not result in a statistically significant difference with placebo for CNS-VS measurement of complex attention and other cognitive outcomes in individuals with mild TBI. The study showed a clinically and statistically significant improvement in all clinical scales assessed by the investigators (post-concussion symptoms, quality of life, and mood). This study showed that post-mild TBI treatment with MLC901 0.8g/day is safe. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04861688.

Matching journals

1
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 74 published papers
#1
44× avg
2
Journal of Neurotrauma
Mary Ann Liebert Inc · based on 11 published papers
#1
180× avg
3
Neurology
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 38 published papers
Top 1.0%
23× avg
4
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 65%
5.6%
5
BMC Neurology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.2%
39× avg
6
Brain and Behavior
Wiley · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.9%
19× avg
7
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 59%
2.6%
8
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Elsevier BV · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.7%
30× avg
9
Journal of Neurology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 22 published papers
Top 2%
15× avg
10
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
SAGE Publications · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
17× avg
11
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
BMJ · based on 26 published papers
Top 3%
8.5× avg
12
European Journal of Neurology
Wiley · based on 20 published papers
Top 2%
15× avg
13
Brain Stimulation
Elsevier BV · based on 27 published papers
Top 2%
7.3× avg
14
Stroke
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 29 published papers
Top 3%
4.0× avg
15
Clinical Neurophysiology
Elsevier BV · based on 19 published papers
Top 2%
7.5× avg
16
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Wiley · based on 84 published papers
Top 5%
0.7%
17
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
Elsevier BV · based on 14 published papers
Top 1%
8.4× avg
18
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 22 published papers
Top 3%
6.0× avg
19
Movement Disorders
Wiley · based on 49 published papers
Top 3%
2.2× avg
20
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 12 published papers
Top 2%
7.6× avg
21
Brain Communications
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 79 published papers
Top 7%
2.3× avg
22
NeuroImage
Elsevier BV · based on 36 published papers
Top 4%
4.0× avg