Antidepressant efficacy of administering repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) concurrently with psychological tasks or interventions: a scoping review and meta-analysis
Giron, C. G.; Tang, A. H. P.; Jin, M.; Kranz, G. S.
Show abstract
Current approaches to optimize the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for depressive symptoms focus on personalizing targets and parameters. But what should occur during these three-to-forty-minute sessions remains under-investigated. Specific concerns include evidence suggesting brain state modulates the brains response to stimulation, and the potential to boost antidepressant efficacy by administering rTMS concurrently with psychological methods. Thus, conducted a scoping review and meta-analysis, per PRISMA-ScR guidelines, to pool studies that administered rTMS during psychological tasks or interventions. PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 10 July 2024. Inclusion criteria: neuropsychiatric patients underwent rTMS; studies assessed depressive symptom severity; psychological tasks or interventions were administered during rTMS, or intentionally did not include a wash-out period. Of 8442 hits, 20 studies combined rTMS with aerobic exercise, bright light therapy, cognitive training or reactivation, psychotherapy, sleep deprivation, or a psychophysical task. Meta-analyses with random effects models pooled the efficacy of these combinations, based on change scores on depressive severity scales. The effect size was large and therapeutic for uncontrolled pretest-posttest comparisons (17 studies, 20 datasets, g=-1.91, SE=0.45, 95%CI= -2.80 to -1.03, p<0.01); medium when studies compared active combinations with sham rTMS plus active psychological methods (8 studies, g=-0.55, SE=0.14, 95%CI= -0.82 to -0.28, p<0.01); and non-significant when active combinations were compared with active rTMS plus sham psychological methods (4 studies, p= 0.96). These findings suggest that the antidepressant efficacy of combining rTMS with psychological methods is promising, but not an improvement over rTMS alone.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Noninvasive brain stimulation combined with evidence-based psychotherapy for psychiatric disorders: A meta-analysis of optimal implementation parameters 94%
- From Feasibility to Utility: A Meta-Analysis of Amygdala-Neurofeedback 93%
- Common and separable neural alterations in adult and adolescent depression – evidence from neuroimaging meta-analyses 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct neurofunctional alterations during motivational and hedonic processing of natural and monetary rewards in depression – a neuroimaging meta-analysis 93%
- Self-blaming emotions in major depression: a randomised pilot trial comparing fMRI neurofeedback training with self-guided psychological strategies (NeuroMooD) 93%
- Pro-cognitive effects of 5-HT4 receptor agonism in individuals with remitted depression 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Oral Ketamine for the Treatment of Depression: A randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis 94%
- Depression is Associated with Treatment Response Trajectories in Adults with Prolonged Grief Disorder: A Machine Learning Analysis 93%
- Consistent Differential Effects of Bupropion and Mirtazapine in Major Depression 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of Non-invasive Spinal Cord Stimulation in Unmedicated Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial and Induced Current Flow Pattern 94%
- Efficacy of optimized multichannel vs conventional tDCS for clinical use in major depression: a randomized controlled trial 94%
- Brain morphometry, stimulation charge, and seizure duration in electroconvulsive therapy 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.