Computational modeling of left ventricular flow using PC-CMR-derived four-dimensional wall motion
Peighambari, S. B.; Mukherjee, T.; Mendiola, E. A.; Darwish, A.; Timmins, L. H.; Pettigrew, R. I.; Shah, D. J.; Avazmohammadi, R.
Show abstract
Intracardiac hemodynamics plays a crucial role in the onset and development of cardiac and valvular diseases. Simulations of blood flow in the left ventricle (LV) have provided valuable insight into assessing LV hemodynamics. While fully coupled fluid-solid modelings of the LV remain challenging due to the complex passive-active behavior of the LV wall myocardium, the integration of imaging-driven quantification of structural motion with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling in the LV holds the promise of feasible and clinically translatable characterization of patient-specific LV hemodynamics. In this study, we propose to integrate two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities with the moving-boundary CFD method to characterize intracardiac LV hemodynamics. Our method uses the standard cine cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images to estimate four-dimensional myocardial motion, eliminating the need for involved myocardial material modeling to capture LV wall behavior. In conjunction with CMR, phase contrast-MRI (PC-MRI) was used to measure temporal blood inflow rates at the mitral orifice, serving as an additional boundary condition. Flow patterns, including velocity streamlines, vortex rings, and kinetic energy, were characterized and compared to the available data. Moreover, relationships between LV wall kinematic markers and flow characteristics were determined without myocardial material modeling and using a non-rigid image registration (NRIR) method. The fidelity of the simulation was quantitatively evaluated by validating the flow rate at the aortic outflow tract against respective PC-MRI measures. The proposed methodology offers a novel and feasible toolset that works with standard PC-CMR protocols to improve the clinical assessment of LV characteristics in prognostic studies and surgical planning.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Ventricular anatomical complexity and gender differences impact predictions from computational models 96%
- {-}CardiOvascular examination in awake Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus pygmaeus): Low-stress Echocardiography including Speckle Tracking imaging (the COOLEST method) 95%
- Model order reduction for left ventricular mechanics via congruency training 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- DeepStrain: A Deep Learning Workflow for the Automated Characterization of Cardiac Mechanics 96%
- Fairness in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Assessing sex and racial bias in deep learning-based segmentation 95%
- Clinical evaluation of the Multimapping technique for simultaneous myocardial T1 and T2 mapping 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated IntraVascular UltraSound Image Processing and Quantification of Coronary Artery Anomalies: The AIVUS-CAA software 95%
- Computational hemodynamic indices to identify Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation degeneration 95%
- Digitizing ECG image: new fully automated method and open-source software code 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of residual intimal flap displacement post-TEVAR on TBAD haemodynamics in compliant, patient-specific CFD simulations informed by MRI 97%
- Effect of Sinotubular Junction Size on TAVR Leaflet Thrombosis: A Fluid-structure Interaction Analysis 96%
- Quantitative Assessment of Aortic Hemodynamics for Varying Left Ventricular Assist Device Outflow Graft Angles and Flow Pulsation 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.