A novel baseline-effect shift tracking model for more sensitive detection of differences in the effects of closely related dopamine transporter inhibitor/ sigma receptor antagonist drug combinations on psychostimulant use.
Paul, R.; Gandhi, R. M.; Job, M. O.
Show abstract
BackgroundFor the purpose of improving the ability to distinguish the activity of closely related drugs on psychostimulant use to enable more specific drug effect characterization, we have developed a new model termed the baseline-effect shift tracking (BEST) model. BEST compares/contrasts the baseline-drug activity relationship(s). AimTo compare the current model to our BEST model to determine which was more effective in distinguishing the effects of combinations of a dopamine transporter inhibitor (methylphenidate, MPD) and selective sigma1 (BD1063) and non-selective sigma (BD1008) receptor antagonists on cocaine consumption. MethodsMale Sprague Dawley rats were trained to self-administer cocaine (n = 9, 0.32 mg/kg/infusion) or sucrose pellets (n = 6, 20 mg pellets/delivery). We determined the effects for cocaine/sucrose of combinations of MPD (1 mg/kg i.p) and 1) BD1063 (0, 3.2, 10 mg/kg i.p), and 2) BD1008 (0, 3.2, 10 mg/kg i.p) on a) consumption at zero price (Q0), and b) essential value (eValue, demand elasticity) estimated using behavioral economic analysis of within-session demand curves, and c) the total intake under the price response curve (TIPR). We compared the models using ANOVA/ regression analysis. ResultsThe current model did not detect any differences in the effects of these drug combinations on cocaine/ sucrose taking behavior. For cocaine, but not for sucrose, the BEST model detected differences in the effects of these drug combinations on TIPR in subjects with higher baseline activity. ConclusionBEST model (with TIPR analysis) is more sensitive than the current models in differentiating drug effects on cocaine consumption.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of the Neutral CB1 Receptor Antagonist AM6527 on Spontaneous, Consummatory, and Motivated Behavior in Mice 94%
- Peer presence and familiarity as key factors to reduce cocaine intake: an effect mediated by the Subthalamic Nucleus 93%
- Xylazine potentiates the interoceptive effects of fentanyl in male and female rats 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hydroxychloroquine increased psychiatric-like behaviors and disrupted the expression of related genes in the mouse brain 94%
- Pharmacological prevention of neonatal opioid withdrawal in a pregnant guinea pig model. 93%
- Pharmacokinetics of caffeine: A systematic analysis of reported data for application in metabolic phenotyping and liver function testing 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cannabinoid receptor 1 positive allosteric modulator ZCZ011 shows differential effects on behavior and the endocannabinoid system in HIV-1 Tat transgenic female and male mice 93%
- Unconditioned and Conditioned Anxiolytic Effects of Sodium Valproate on Flavor Neophobia and Fear Conditioning 93%
- Tesofensine, a novel antiobesity drug, silences GABAergic hypothalamic neurons 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Role of Glucocorticoid and Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in the Reward-Enhancing Effects of Nicotine in the ICSS Procedure in Male and Female Rats 94%
- Lorcaserin maintenance fails to attenuate heroin vs food choice in rhesus monkeys 94%
- Distinct populations suppress or escalate intake of cocaine paired with aversive quinine. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nandrolone alters the behavioral response to cocaine as well as striatal and cortical dopamine receptors of prepubertal male rats. 94%
- Pharmacokinetics and Central Accumulation of Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and its Bioactive Metabolites are Influenced by Route of Administration and Sex 93%
- Dopamine D1-like receptor blockade and stimulation decreases operant responding for nicotine and food in male and female rats 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.