Back

Development of a highly-sensitive method to detect the carriage of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in humans

Shahab, S. N.; van Veen, A.; Kempenaars, N.; Rijfkogel, A.; Schmitt, H.; Saharman, Y. R.; Vos, M. C.; Karuniawati, A.; Severin, J. A.

2024-08-27 microbiology
10.1101/2024.08.27.609846 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) causes severe and potentially life-threatening infections in hospitalized patients with mortality rates of more than 40%. To detect CRPA carriage in humans for surveillance purposes or to prevent spread and outbreaks in hospitals, a highly-sensitive culture method for CRPA carriage in humans is needed. We aimed to develop such a highly-sensitive method, that would be feasible in laboratories with limited resources. In this study, seven well-defined CRPA strains belonging to high-risk clones were used, including one CRPA without a carbapenemase gene and six carbapenem-resistant isolates with carbapenemase genes. We applied a stepwise approach wherein we included four enrichment broths and eight Pseudomonas aeruginosa-selective culture media. Spiking experiments were performed to further evaluate the combination of the most sensitive enrichment broths and selective agar plates in human samples. The two most sensitive enrichments broths were TSB-vancomycin and TSB-vancomycin with 2 mg/L imipenem and the most sensitive selective agar plates were Pseudomonas isolation agar Becton Dickinson, Pseudomonas isolation agar Sigma-Aldrich, and M-PA-C (Becton Dickinson). After the spiking experiment, the best method for detecting CRPA based on the sensitivity and the selectivity was the combination of TSB-vancomycin with 2 mg/L imipenem as an enrichment broth for overnight incubation, followed by subculturing the broth on M-PA-C agar plate. We have thus developed a highly-sensitive selective method to detect CRPA carriage in humans, which can also be applied in limited-resource laboratories. This may contribute to an overall effort to control CRPA.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.6%
2
Journal of Applied Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
7.9%
4
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
187 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.3%
5
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.2%
6
Journal of Medical Microbiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
Antibiotics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
9
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
10
Microbiology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
11
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
12
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
BMC Microbiology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
14
Microorganisms
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
16
Journal of Microbiological Methods
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
19
Access Microbiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
Current Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.8%
24
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
MicrobiologyOpen
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%