Back

Effects of connectivity hyperalignment (CHA) on estimated brain network properties: from coarse-scale to fine-scale

Farahani, F. V.; Nebel, M. B.; Wager, T.; Lindquist, M. A.

2024-08-28 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.08.27.609817 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recent gains in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have been driven by increasingly sophisticated statistical and computational techniques and the ability to capture brain data at finer spatial and temporal resolution. These advances allow researchers to develop population-level models of the functional brain representations underlying behavior, performance, clinical status, and prognosis. However, even following conventional preprocessing pipelines, considerable inter-individual disparities in functional localization persist, posing a hurdle to performing compelling population-level inference. Persistent misalignment in functional topography after registration and spatial normalization will reduce power in developing predictive models and biomarkers, reduce the specificity of estimated brain responses and patterns, and provide misleading results on local neural representations and individual differences. This study aims to determine how connectivity hyperalignment (CHA)--an analytic approach for handling functional misalignment--can change estimated functional brain network topologies at various spatial scales from the coarsest set of parcels down to the vertex-level scale. The findings highlight the role of CHA in improving inter-subject similarities, while retaining individual-specific information and idiosyncrasies at finer spatial granularities. This highlights the potential for fine-grained connectivity analysis using this approach to reveal previously unexplored facets of brain structure and function.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.