Back

De novo design of potent inhibitors of Clostridioides difficile toxin B

Ragotte, R. J.; Tam, J.; Miletic, S.; Palou, R.; Weidle, C.; Li, Z.; Gloegl, M.; Beilhartz, G. L.; Liang, H.; Carr, K. D.; Borst, A. J.; Coventry, B.; Wang, X.; Rubinstein, J. L.; Tyers, M.; Melnyk, R. A.; Baker, D.

2024-08-26 microbiology
10.1101/2024.08.26.609740 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Clostridioides difficile is a major cause of secondary disease in hospitals. During infection, C. difficile toxin B drives disease pathology. Here we use deep learning and Rosetta-based approaches to de novo design small proteins that block the entry of TcdB into cells. These molecules have binding affinities and neutralization IC50s in the pM range and are compelling candidates for further clinical development. By directly targeting the toxin rather than the pathogen, these molecules have the advantage of immediate cessation of disease and lower selective pressure for escape compared to conventional antibiotics. As C. difficile infects the colon, the protease and pH resistance of the designed proteins opens the door to oral delivery of engineered biologics. Significance statementC. difficile infection (CDI) is a major public health concern with over half a million cases in the United States annually resulting in 30,000 deaths. Current therapies are inadequate and frequently result in cycles of recurrent infection (rCDI). Progress has been made in the development of anti-toxin mAb therapies that can reduce the rate of rCDI, but these remain unaffordable and out of reach for many patients. Using de novo protein design, we developed small protein inhibitors targeting two independent receptor binding sites on the toxin that drives pathology during CDI. These molecules are high affinity, potently neutralizing and stable in simulated intestinal fluid, making them strong candidates for the clinical development of new CDI therapies.

Published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.