YOLO-Behaviour: A simple, flexible framework to automatically quantify animal behaviours from videos
Chan, A. H. H.; Putra, P.; Schupp, H.; Köchling, J.; Strassheim, J.; Renner, B.; Schroeder, J.; Pearse, W. D.; Nakagawa, S.; Burke, T.; Griesser, M.; Meltzer, A.; Lubrano, S.; Kano, F.
Show abstract
Manually coding behaviours from videos is essential to study animal behaviour but it is labour-intensive and susceptible to inter-rater bias and reliability issues. Recent developments of computer vision tools enable the automatic quantification of behaviours, supplementing or even replacing manual annotations. However, widespread adoption of these methods is still limited, due to the lack of annotated training datasets and domain-specific knowledge required to optimize these models for animal research. Here, we present YOLO-Behaviour, a flexible framework for identifying visually distinct behaviours from video recordings. The framework is robust, easy to implement, and requires minimal manual annotations as training data. We demonstrate the flexibility of the framework with case studies for event-wise detection in house sparrow nestling provisioning, Siberian jay feeding, human eating behaviours, and frame-wise detections of various behaviours in pigeons, zebras, and giraffes. Our results show that the framework reliably detects behaviours accurately, and retrieve comparable accuracy metrics to manual annotation. However, metrics extracted for event-wise detection were less correlated with manual annotation, and potential reasons for the discrepancy between manual annotation and automatic detection are discussed. To mitigate this problem, the framework can be used as a hybrid approach of first detecting events using the pipeline and then manually confirming the detections, saving annotation time. We provide detailed documentation and guidelines on how to implement the YOLO-Behaviour framework, for researchers to readily train and deploy new models on their own study systems. We anticipate the framework can be another step towards lowering the barrier of entry for applying computer vision methods in animal behaviour.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Visual Field Analysis: a reliable method to score left- and right eye-use using automated tracking 94%
- My friend MIROSLAV: A Hackable Open-Source Hardware and Software Platform for High-Throughput Rodent Activity Monitoring in the Home Cage 92%
- GoFish: A low-cost, open-source platform for closed-loop behavioural experiments on fish 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of Two Individual Identification Algorithms for Snow Leopards (Panthera uncia) after Automated Detection 95%
- Exploiting facial side similarities to improve AI-driven sea turtle photo-identification systems 94%
- Insect Size Matters: Using Image and Dimensions Together Improves Image Classification 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.