Back

The public health co-benefits of strategies consistent with net-zero emissions: a systematic review of quantitative studies

Moutet, L.; Bernard, P.; Green, R.; Milner, J.; Haines, A.; Slama, R.; TEMIME, L.; Jean, K.

2024-08-26 public and global health
10.1101/2024.08.26.24312597 medRxiv
Show abstract

Moving toward net-zero emission societies is projected to provide health co-benefits, yet their magnitude is not well documented and may be context-specific. Synthesizing the evidence on these co-benefits could enhance the engagement of decision-makers and populations in climate mitigation actions. We performed a systematic review including 58 quantitative studies exploring 125 scenarios. Across air quality, physical activity and dietary changes pathways, substantial health co-benefits were found, with half of scenarios showing a mortality reduction by more than 1.5%, in addition to benefits directly related to climate stabilization. However, these co-benefits varied with explored emission sectors, decarbonization levers, modelling approaches and locations. Among studies including a cost-benefit analysis, 11 of 13 estimated that monetized benefits outweighed the costs of implementing climate policies. This review highlights the need for a standardised framework to assess and compare health impacts of climate mitigation actions across sectors, and confirms that achieving net-zero goals supports far-reaching public health policies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.