Back

Electronic health record biobank cohort recapitulates an association between the MUC5B promoter polymorphism and ARDS in critically ill adults.

Kerchberger, V. E.; McNeil, J. B.; Zheng, N.; Chang, D.; Rosenberger, C.; Rogers, A. J.; Bastarache, J. A.; Feng, Q.; Wei, W.; Ware, L. B.

2024-08-26 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2024.08.26.24312498 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLarge population-based DNA biobanks linked to electronic health records (EHRs) may provide novel opportunities to identify genetic drivers of ARDS. Research QuestionCan we develop an EHR-based algorithm to identify ARDS in a biobank database, and can this validate a previously reported ARDS genetic risk factor? Study Design and MethodsWe analyzed two parallel genotyped cohorts: a prospective biomarker cohort of critically ill adults (VALID), and a retrospective cohort of hospitalized participants enrolled in a de-identified EHR biobank (BioVU). ARDS was identified by clinician-investigator review in VALID and an EHR algorithm in BioVU (EHR-ARDS). We tested the association between the MUC5B promoter polymorphism rs35705950 with development of ARDS, and assessed if age modified this genetic association in each cohort. ResultsIn VALID, 2,795 patients were included, age was 55 [43, 66] (median [IQR]) years, and 718 (25.7%) developed ARDS. In BioVU, 9,025 hospitalized participants were included, age was 60 [48, 70] years, and 1,056 (11.7%) developed EHR-ARDS. We observed a significant age-related interaction effect on ARDS in VALID: among older patients, rs35705950 was associated with increased ARDS risk (OR: 1.44; 95%CI 1.08-1.92; p=0.012) whereas among younger patients this effect was absent (OR: 0.84; 95%CI: 0.62-1.14; p=0.26). In BioVU, rs35705950 was associated with increased risk for EHR-ARDS among all participants (OR: 1.20; 95%CI: 1.00-1.43, p=0.043) and this did not vary by age. The polymorphism was also associated worse oxygenation in mechanically ventilated BioVU participants, but had no association with oxygenation in VALID. InterpretationThe MUC5B promoter polymorphism was associated with ARDS in two cohorts of at-risk adults. Although age-related effect modification was observed only in VALID, BioVU identified a consistent association between MUC5B and ARDS risk regardless of age, and a novel association with oxygenation impairment. Our study highlights the potential for EHR biobanks to enable precision-medicine ARDS studies.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
2
CHEST
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
3
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.6%
4
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
5
Critical Care Explorations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
7
Critical Care Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
10
Critical Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Thorax
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Pediatric Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
15
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
17
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.7%
19
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
20
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
22
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
24
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
25
Journal of General Internal Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
29
British Journal of Anaesthesia
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
30
ERJ Open Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%