Anxious individuals are more sensitive to changes in outcome variability and value differences in dynamic environments
McCoy, B.; Lawson, R. P.
Show abstract
Anxiety is known to alter learning in uncertain environments. Standard experimental paradigms and computational models addressing these differences have mainly assessed the impact of volatility, and anxious individuals have been shown to have a reduced learning rate when moving from a stable to volatile environment. Previous research has not, however, independently assessed the impact of both changes in volatility, i.e., reversals in reward contingency, and changes in outcome variability (noise) in the same individuals. Here we use a simple probabilistic reversal learning paradigm to independently manipulate the level of volatility and noise at the experimental level in a fully orthogonal design. We replicate general increases, irrespective of anxiety levels, in both positive and negative learning rates when moving from low to high volatility, but only in the context of low noise. When low volatility is combined with high noise, more anxious individuals display negative learning rates similar to high volatility with high noise, whereas those lower in anxiety show the usual negative learning rate increase from low to high volatility. Within-individual increases in lose-shift responses from low to high noise conditions scale with levels of anxious traits, but this occurs under low volatility only. We furthermore find that people with higher anxious traits are more accurate overall and utilize a more exploitative decision-making strategy in this dynamic environment. Our findings suggest that changes in both sources of uncertainty, volatility and noise, should be carefully considered when assessing learning, particularly in relation to anxiety and other neuropsychiatric conditions, and implicate anxiety-related differences in dopaminergic and noradrenergic neurotransmitter signalling when learning in highly changeable environments.
Matching journals
The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Defensive freezing and its relation to approach-avoidance decision-making under threat 95%
- The Threat of Scream paradigm: A tool for studying sustained physiological and subjective anxiety 94%
- Individual differences in fear acquisition: Multivariate analyses of different Emotional Negativity scales, physiological responding, subjective measures, and neural activation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Beyond single discrete responses: An integrative and multidimensional analysis of behavioral dynamics assisted by Machine Learning 90%
- A Reinforcement Learning Model with Choice Traces for a Progressive Ratio Schedule 90%
- The role of parvalbumin interneuron GIRK signaling in regulation of affect and cognition inmale and female mice 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Dual process impairments in reinforcement learning and working memory systems underlie learning deficits in physiological anxiety 95%
- Bayesian Accounts of Perceptual Decisions in the Nonclinical Continuum of Psychosis: Greater Imprecision in Both Top-down and Bottom-up Processes 94%
- Motor response vigour and fixations reflect subjective preferences during intertemporal choice 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.