A forward genetic screen identifies Sirtuin1 as a driver of neuroendocrine prostate cancer
Nunes de Almeida, F.; Vasciaveo, A.; Antao, A. M.; Zou, M.; Di Bernardo, M.; de Brot, S.; Rodriguez-Calero, A.; Chui, A.; Wang, A. L. E.; Floch, N.; Kim, J. Y.; Afari, S. N.; Mukhammadov, T.; Arriaga, J. M.; Lu, J.; Shen, M. M.; Rubin, M.; Califano, A.; Abate-Shen, C.
Show abstract
Although localized prostate cancer is relatively indolent, advanced prostate cancer manifests with aggressive and often lethal variants, including neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC). To identify drivers of aggressive prostate cancer, we leveraged Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon mutagenesis in a mouse model based on prostate-specific loss-of-function of Pten and Tp53. Compared with control mice, SB mice developed more aggressive prostate tumors, with increased incidence of metastasis. Notably, a significant percentage of the SB prostate tumors display NEPC phenotypes, and the transcriptomic features of these SB mouse tumors recapitulated those of human NEPC. We identified common SB transposon insertion sites (CIS) and prioritized associated CIS-genes differentially expressed in NEPC versus non-NEPC SB tumors. Integrated analysis of CIS-genes encoding for proteins representing upstream, post-translational modulators of master regulators controlling the transcriptional state of SB-mouse and human NEPC tumors identified sirtuin 1 (Sirt1) as a candidate mechanistic determinant of NEPC. Gain-of-function studies in human prostate cancer cell lines confirmed that SIRT1 promotes NEPC, while its loss-of-function or pharmacological inhibition abrogates NEPC. This integrative analysis is generalizable and can be used to identify novel cancer drivers for other malignancies. SummaryUsing an unbiased forward mutagenesis screen in an autochthonous mouse model, we have investigated mechanistic determinants of aggressive prostate cancer. SIRT1 emerged as a key regulator of neuroendocrine prostate cancer differentiation and a potential target for therapeutic intervention.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining cellular population dynamics at single cell resolution during prostate cancer progression 98%
- A single-cell atlas of the mouse and human prostate reveals heterogeneity and conservation of epithelial progenitors 96%
- CREB5 reprograms nuclear interactions to promote resistance to androgen receptor targeting therapies 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reduced NCOR2 expression accelerates androgen deprivation therapy failure in prostate cancer 95%
- Mapping the tumor stress network reveals dynamic shifts in the stromal oxidative stress response 94%
- Genetic Impairment of Succinate Metabolism Disrupts Bioenergetic Sensing in Adrenal Neuroendocrine Cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Macrophage-derived cholesterol contributes to therapeutic resistance in prostate cancer 95%
- Targeting subtype-specific metabolic preferences in nucleotide biosynthesis inhibits tumor growth in a breast cancer model 94%
- Cis-Regulatory Element Hijacking by Structural Variants Overshadows Higher-Order Topological Changes in Primary Prostate Cancer 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-cell ATAC and RNA sequencing reveal pre-existing and persistent subpopulations of cells associated with relapse of prostate cancer 96%
- Transcriptional network involving ERG and AR orchestrates Distal-Less Homeobox 1 mediated prostate cancer progression. 95%
- Pparg drives luminal differentiation and luminal tumor formation in the urothelium 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Explainable Machine Learning Identifies Dosage Compensation Factors in Aneuploid Human Cancer Cells 94%
- STAT3-dependent systems-level analysis reveals PDK4 as an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer 93%
- KDML: a machine-learning framework for inference of multi-scale gene functions from genetic perturbation screens 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.