Back

Dynamic convergence of autism disorder risk genes across neurodevelopment

Fernandez Garcia, M.; Retallick-Townsley, K.; Pruitt, A.; Davidson, E.; Dai, Y.; Fitzpatrick, S. E.; Sen, A.; Cohen, S.; Livoti, O.; Khan, S.; Dossou, G.; Cheung, J.; Deans, P. J. M.; Wang, Z.; Huckins, L.; Hoffman, E.; Brennand, K.

2024-08-24 genetics
10.1101/2024.08.23.609190 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Over three hundred and seventy-three risk genes, broadly enriched for roles in neuronal communication and gene expression regulation, underlie risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and developmental delay (DD). Functional genomic studies of subsets of these genes consistently indicate a convergent role in neurogenesis, but how these diverse risk genes converge on a smaller number of biological pathways in mature neurons is unclear. To uncover shared downstream impacts between neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD) risk genes, here we apply a pooled CRISPR approach to contrast the transcriptomic impacts of targeting 29 NDD loss-of-function genes across human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived neural progenitor cells, glutamatergic neurons, and GABAergic neurons. Points of convergence vary between the cell types of the brain and are greatest in mature glutamatergic neurons, where they broadly target not just synaptic and epigenetic, but unexpectedly, mitochondrial biology. The strongest convergent networks occur between NDD genes with common co-expression patterns in the post-mortem brain, biological annotations, and clinical associations, suggesting that convergence may one-day inform patient stratification and treatment. Towards this, ten out of eleven drugs tested that were predicted to reverse convergent signatures in human cells and/or arousal and sensory processing behaviors in zebrafish ameliorated at least one behavioral phenotype in vivo. Altogether, robust convergence in post-mitotic neurons represents a clinically actionable therapeutic window.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.