Back

Protocol for a scoping review of theorised pathways between home energy decarbonisation and health and health inequalities

Ponce Hardy, V.; Stevenson, A.; McCartney, G.; Heppenstall, A.; Meier, P.

2024-08-23 public and global health
10.1101/2024.08.23.24312045 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionAccess to adequate energy in the home is necessary for a healthy and well life, however current energy use, particularly in high-income countries, is unsustainable. Decarbonisation of home energy can benefit climate mitigation and health but there is the potential to create new, or compound existing, inequalities in health if not implemented equitably. Mapping the theoretical causal pathways between home decarbonisation and health will contribute to further understanding of these mechanisms. AimsFirstly, to identify theoretical pathways between decarbonisation of home energy and health and health inequalities in high-income countries, and secondly, to synthesise these into a putative causal evidence map. Inclusion criteriaAll populations in high-income countries are included, as defined by the World Bank in 2023/24. Included concepts are decarbonisation of home energy, and health and health inequalities. Context for this review comprises of the inclusion of a clear theory linking the concepts. All study designs are included. MethodsThis protocol is for a review of theories rather than of intervention effectiveness. Medline/OVID, Scopus, and EconLit will be searched, with no limitation on date. Relevant international policy websites will also be searched. The search is limited to papers in English. Citation tracing may identify further relevant papers. Abstracts and full texts will be screened using Rayyan. At least 10% will be double-screened, and the rest screened by one author, and included full texts will be screened until data saturation is reached. Study inclusion is based on consistency with the inclusion criteria, with some flexibility allowed due to the theoretical nature of this review. Data extracted from papers will be used to develop a diagrammatic map of pathways.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Health & Place
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
2
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
3
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.6%
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.9%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.4%
6
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
7
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
Social Science & Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
10
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
11
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.4%
14
Systematic Reviews
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
15
Environmental Research Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
16
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
17
Sustainability
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
18
Journal of Public Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
19
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
20
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
21
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
22
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
23
International Journal of Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
24
Environmental Pollution
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
25
Journal of Global Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
26
European Journal of Public Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
27
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
29
Public Health in Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%