Climate, population size, and dispersal influences mutational load across the landscape in Vitis arizonica
Fiscus, C. J.; Aguirre-Liguori, J. A.; Gaut, G. R. J.; Gaut, B. S.
Show abstract
The interplay between genetics and the environment determines a populations ability to survive. Plants, being immobile, are particularly vulnerable to environmental shifts and must adapt to their local environment or face extinction. While considerable efforts have been devoted to identifying adaptive genetic variation and to model its relationship with climate, the role of deleterious variation has been largely overlooked. To address this gap, we studied the landscape genomics of Vitis arizonica, a grape species endemic to the American Southwest and a crop wild relative of the domesticated grapevine. We estimated mutational load, a component of genetic load, in 162 individuals sampled across the present species range and built temporal species distribution models (SDMs) to project the historical, present, and future distributions of V. arizonica to infer species range dynamics. Mutational load was highest for individuals at an inferred leading edge of range expansion. Using random forest regression (RF) models, we examined the relationship between mutational load and climatic variation. The RF models, which we transformed by a weighting method to account for correlated predictors, identified climatic variables, historical dispersion distances, and heterozygosity as high-ranking features. Our findings show that mutational load can be predicted and identifies features that contribute to load. These results provide a foundation for integrating mutational load into broader efforts to understand species adaptation and maladaptation in the face of climate change. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTThe accumulation of deleterious genetic variation (i.e., genetic load) in a genome can reduce organismal fitness and hinder adaptation to local conditions. While the genetic mechanisms contributing to genetic load have been well-studied, its interaction with environmental variation is less understood. Here we explored the relationship between climatic variation, species range, and genetic load in Vitis arizonica, a wild grape species native to the American Southwest. We identified associations between climatic variation and genetic load and built a machine learning model to predict genetic load under future climate scenarios. Our findings suggest that the species range will expand and that genetic load will slightly increase at the population level by the end of the century. This work enhances our understanding of the environmental factors influencing genetic load.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the persistence and utility of five wild Vitis species in the context of climate change 97%
- Climate adaptation and vulnerability of foundation species in a global change hotspot 96%
- Environmental correlates of genetic variation in the invasive and largely panmictic European starling in North America 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Resolving spatial complexities of hybridization in the context of the gray zone of speciation in North American ratsnakes (Pantherophis obsoletus complex) 95%
- Replicate avian hybrid zones reveal the progression of genetic and trait introgression through time 95%
- Elevational and Oceanic Barriers Shape the Distribution, Dispersal and Diversity of Aotearoa's Kapokapowai (Uropetala) Dragonflies 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cities as evolutionary incubators for the global spread of the Spotted Lanternfly 96%
- Large genetic divergence underpins cryptic local adaptation across ecological and evolutionary gradients 95%
- Climate change impacts on the phylogenetic diversity of the world's terrestrial birds: more than species numbers 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.