Back

Large-scale manipulation of radial positioning does not affect most aspects of genome organization

Guetta, M.; Kariti, H.; Sherman, L.; Israitel, L.; Tel-Paz, M.; Avidan, N.; Shemer, R.; Kaplan, N.

2024-08-23 genomics
10.1101/2024.08.22.609170 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Although the spatial organization of the genome is closely linked to biological function, genome structure is highly stochastic. Within this heterogeneity, specific function-associated structural elements must be maintained, even when the nucleus is deformed due to physiological physical constraints. The radial positioning of genomic loci - their distance from the nuclear periphery - has long been considered an important feature of genome organization which is correlated with both structural elements and genomic activity. In the current study, we developed an experimental system for manipulating the radial positioning of the genome, by expressing the sperm-specific protein Prm1 in somatic cells. By microscopy, we observe that initial Prm1 nuclear foci develop within 72 hours into a large Prm1 focus occupying most of the nuclear interior, while the entire genome is driven towards the nuclear periphery, resulting in a 3-5 fold reduction in the volume that the genome occupies. Noting that this system enables isolation of a pure population of cells with reorganized nuclei, we then used Hi-C to study the effects of this perturbation. Remarkably, we find that interaction patterns are largely robust to this major nuclear reorganization, with minor changes which mostly reflect a strengthening of heterochromatin self-interactions. Our experimental system provides means for manipulating nuclear organization in a reproducible manner, potentially allowing to examine radial positioning decoupled from other features of genome organization. Highlighting the complementary nature of microscopic and genomic methods, our work further suggests a remarkable resilience of genome structure such that large-scale nuclear changes, including chromosome compression and changes in radial positioning, can occur without extensive alteration of functional genome organization.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.2%
2
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.2%
3
Chromosome Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.2%
5
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.9%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.9%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
12
Epigenetics & Chromatin
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
13
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.8%
15
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.7%
17
Chromosoma
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
18
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
19
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
22
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
25
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
26
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Nucleus
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
28
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
29
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
30
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%