Virtual Clinical Trials of BMP4 Differentiation Therapy: Digital Twins to Aid Glioblastoma Trial Design
Harbour, N.; Curtin, L.; Hubbard, M. E.; Jackson, P. R.; Rani, V.; Carrano, A.; Farias, V. d. A.; Kenchappa, R.; Quinones-Hinojosa, A.; Owen, M.; Swanson, K. R.
Show abstract
Glioma stem cells (GSCs) are considered a major driver of glioblastoma (GBM) progression and are highly resistant to standard cytotoxic treatments. BMP4 has been shown to drive differentiation of GSCs, increase sensitivity to radiotherapy, slow growth and increase survival times in animal models. To assess the potential of BMP4 as a differentiation therapy, we develop a mathematical model that describes the growth of a GBM tumor via a hierarchy of GSCs, progenitor cells and terminally differentiated cells. We parametrize our model using experimental data from twelve patient-derived GSC lines, on which we measured response to radiotherapy and population growth with and without exposure to BMP4. Cell lines were typically more sensitive to radiotherapy after two days of BMP4 treatment but population growth can either increase or decrease after seven days of exposure to BMP4. To identify key parameters that drive successful treatment we perform global sensitivity analysis which identifies key parameters for BMP4 efficacy including proliferation rate and self-renewal sensitivity of GSCs. We then compare two treatment schedules: a single dose of BMP4 at resection and continuous delivery of BMP4 from resection till the end of radiotherapy. Due to the short half-life of BMP4 and its synergy with radiotherapy, continuous delivery of BMP4 during radiotherapy is more effective than a single dose prior to radiotherapy. We then perform a series of virtual clinical trials, stratified by tumor proliferation rate and GSC self-renewal sensitivity, which allows us to estimate the probability of observing a successful early-phase clinical trial for various virtual patient cohorts. We find that trials that selected the subset of patients with more proliferative GBMs were more likely to lead to significant improvements in survival. SignificanceTargeting glioma stem cells with BMP4 provides a novel opportunity to shift the complex cellular ecosystem of gliomas to enhance treatment efficacy. Mathematical modelling can facilitate optimal patient tumor feature selection when designing successful clinical trials.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhanced perfusion following exposure to radiotherapy: a theoretical investigation 96%
- Radiation necrosis after radiation therapy treatment of brain metastases: A computational approach 95%
- Combining Hypoxia-Activated Prodrugs and Radiotherapy in silico: Impact of Treatment Scheduling and the Intra-Tumoural Oxygen Landscape 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling CAR T-cell Therapy with Patient Preconditioning 95%
- Targeting cellular DNA damage responses in cancer: An in vitro-calibrated agent-based model simulating monolayer and spheroid treatment responses to ATR-inhibiting drugs 95%
- Deriving Optimal Treatment Timing for Adaptive Therapy: Matching the Model to the Tumor Dynamics 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Radio-Immune Response Modelling for Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy 95%
- Development of a Coupled Simulation Toolkit for Computational Radiation Biology Based on Geant4 and CompuCell3D 93%
- Deciphering Oxygen Distribution and Hypoxia Profiles in the Tumor Microenvironment: A Data-Driven Mechanistic Modeling Approach 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Radiation-induced cell cycle perturbations: acomputational tool validated with flow-cytometrydata 94%
- Intermittent radiotherapy as alternative treatment for recurrent high grade glioma: A modelling study based on longitudinal tumor measurements 93%
- Reinforcement learning derived chemotherapeutic schedules for robust patient-specific therapy 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.