Machine learning model to predict risk assessment of a child inheriting a genetic disorder
Ramaswamy, M.; Senthilnathan, S.; Saravanan, A. R. I.; M, S.; Sivashanmugam, K.
Show abstract
Advancements in Machine Learning (ML) have revolutionised precision medicine, particularly in predicting and preventing genetic disorders. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of ML models designed for the risk assessment of genetic disorders in children, based on clinical history and pedigree analysis. Leveraging a diverse dataset of familial genetic profiles, clinical outcomes, and medical histories, we employed ML algorithms to identify inheritance patterns, assess genetic risks for Mendelian disorders, and predict disease recurrence. The analysis incorporates several ML algorithms, including Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, and Support Vector Machines (SVM), with the Gradient Boosting model achieving the highest mean cross-validation score of over 0.99. Designed for primary care physicians and healthcare professionals, this model aids in genetic counselling by predicting genetic disorder recurrence based on family history. The paper also addresses ethical and legal considerations, emphasising the importance of genetic counselling and informed decision-making. This tool is intended to support, not replace, medical professionals. This work advances personalised risk assessment for Mendelian single-gene disorders, including autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and X-linked recessive disorders, contributing to the field of genomic medicine and facilitating effective family planning strategies. Author summaryGenetic disorders are posing significant socio-economic, health, and psychological burdens due to the risk of inheritance, which can impact future generations with health complications. Genetic counselling has emerged as an important tool to help manage this issue, offering guidance to susceptible families. Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have introduced new avenues for predicting the risk of genetic disorders with greater accuracy. The aim was to leverage machine learning models that would predict the risk assessment for single gene chromosomal Mendelian disorders. To train these models, patient data was collected from a clinical geneticist at a renowned hospital, all of whom had confirmed genetic testing results. This data was used to train the models that predicted the likelihood of the next child inheriting a genetic disorder. The initial results are promising, demonstrating a good fit with the data. However, it should be noted that larger sample sizes are needed to improve the accuracy of any model. With more extensive data, its predictive capabilities can be significantly enhanced. This tool has the potential to be a resource for genetic counsellors and primary healthcare physicians, aiding them in providing more accurate risk assessments and personalised guidance to families.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- ChatGPT-Enhanced ROC Analysis (CERA): A Shiny Web Tool for Finding Optimal Cutoff in Biomarker Analysis 94%
- Predicting long-term Type 2 Diabetes with Support Vector Machine using Oral Glucose Tolerance Test 93%
- Time-to-event estimation of birth year prevalence trends: a method to enable investigating the etiology of childhood disorders including autism 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel ratio-metric features enable the identification of new driver genes across cancer types 95%
- Classification models for Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Progression, based on gene expression data-trained supervised machine learning 93%
- Machine learning for classifying chronic kidney disease and predicting creatinine levels using at-home measurements 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.