Back

Functional capacities drive recruitment of bacteria into plant root microbiota

Selten, G.; Lamouche, F.; Gomez-Repolles, A.; Blahovska, Z.; Kelly, S.; de Jonge, R.; Radutoiu, S.

2024-08-22 plant biology
10.1101/2024.08.22.609090 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Host-associated microbiota follow predictable assembly patterns but show significant variation at the bacterial isolate level depending on the host and environmental context. This variability poses challenges for studying, predicting, and engineering microbiomes. Here we examined how Arabidopsis, Barley, and Lotus plants recruit specific bacteria from highly complex synthetic communities (SynComs) composed of hundreds of bacterial isolates originating from these plants when grown in natural soil. We discovered that, despite their taxonomic diversity, bacteria enriched by these three plant species encode largely overlapping functions. A set of 266 functions common among all host-associated communities was identified at the foundation of the microbiotas functional potential. Analysis of the differences observed between root-associated communities revealed that functions recruited by Arabidopsis and Barley were primarily driven by the SynCom composition, while Lotus selected fewer isolates but with more diverse functionalities, akin to a Swiss army knife strategy. We analysed the variation at the functional level and found this can be explained by the combined functions of bacteria at the family level. Additionally, across major taxa, the isolates covering a broader range of their familys functional diversity achieved higher relative abundance in the root communities. Our work sheds light on key functions and principles guiding the recruitment of bacterial isolates into root microbiota, offering valuable insights for microbiome engineering and inoculant discovery at a previously inaccessible taxonomic level.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.