The neural mechanisms of fast versus slow decision-making
Nashaat, M.; Oraby, H.; Krasniqi, F.; Goh-Sauerbier, S. T.; Bosc, M.; Koerner, S.; Karayel, S.; Kepecs, A.; Larkum, M.
Show abstract
Is more haste less speed? Decision time variability has been attributed to speed/accuracy trade-offs(1), internal mental architecture(2), and noisy evidence accumulation(3-5). However, exploring these possibilities is difficult in rodents that consistently behave impulsively. Here, we demonstrate a novel floating-platform system that allows head-fixed mice to voluntarily vary decision times, akin to observed human behavior, in combination with sensitive neuroimaging approaches. We track the activity flow from medial to lateral frontal cortex (MFC to LFC) and record sequences of single-neuron activity. Choice-selective neurons displayed divergent temporal codes between MFC and LFC, with remarkable MFC susceptibility to optogenetic inhibition. These results suggest that LFC acts as an integrative motor threshold, while MFC plays a broader cognitive role in strategy and choice-selection.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Fast updating feedback from piriform cortex to the olfactory bulb relays multimodal reward contingency signals during rule-reversal 98%
- A cortico-collicular pathway for motor planning in a memory-dependent perceptual decision task 98%
- Cone Opponent Functional Domains in Primary Visual Cortex Combine Signals for Color Appearance Mechanisms 98%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The hippocampus as a perceptual map: neuronal and behavioral discrimination during memory encoding 98%
- A cortical circuit mechanism for coding and updating task structural knowledge in inference-based decision-making 98%
- A latent pool of neurons silenced by sensory-evoked inhibition can be recruited to enhance perception 98%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.