Effectiveness of interactive dashboards to optimise prescribing in primary care: A systematic review
McCarthy, C.; Moynagh, P.; Mannion, A.; Wei, A.; Clyne, B.; Moriarty, F.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe World Health Organisations Medication Without Harm campaign aims to reduce severe avoidable medication related harm by 50%. This systematic review explored the characteristics of interventions that provide visual and longitudinal feedback on prescribing, or interactive dashboards, in general practice and the effect of these interventions on prescribing-related outcome measures. MethodsThis systematic review was registered prospectively and reported in line with PRISMA guidelines. Multiple databases and grey literature were searched in November 2023 to identify interventional studies that explored the effect of interactive dashboards on prescribing-related outcomes in general practice. Two independent researchers conducted screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Interventions were described narratively, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed for comparable studies. ResultsEight randomised controlled trials, one controlled before-and-after study and three interrupted time series were included. Six studies reported a significant positive effect on prescribing-related outcomes, with an effect seen more often for studies focusing on potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) (four out of six). Two of the six studies that focused on antibiotic prescribing demonstrated a significant effect. A meta-analysis of three RCTs involving 160 general practices and 198,135 patients demonstrated the overall odds of PIP was 0.91 (95%CI: 0.77-1.06 I2=71.8%) in the intervention compared to control group. ConclusionInteractive dashboards show promise for supporting safe and effective prescribing in general practice. Future research should focus on developing core outcome sets to facilitate future meta-analyses of effectiveness as well as optimising their implementation and understanding how to sustain user engagement. Lay summaryThe World Health Organizations "Medication Without Harm" campaign aims to reduce preventable medication-related harm by 50%. One way to support safe prescribing is by giving prescribers ongoing feedback on their prescribing habits using interactive dashboards. These dashboards provide visual and long-term data to help guide safer and more effective prescribing. This research looked at how interactive dashboards have been used in general practice and whether their use improves prescribing. Researchers systematically searched the published literature and identified 12 relevant studies. Some studies involved randomly assigning doctors or practices to either use the dashboards or continue usual care. Others compared prescribing practices before and after introducing dashboards or looked at practices that used dashboards compared to those that did not. Six of the studies showed improvements in prescribing, especially when focused on reducing high-risk prescriptions. The data for three studies that looked at high-risk prescribing involving 160 general practices and 198,135 patients showed that interactive dashboards may reduce the chance of unsafe prescribing by 8.8%. However, this result was not statistically significant, and the difference in results between studies means the true effect remains uncertain. The findings highlight the potential of interactive dashboards to support safer prescribing in general practice, though further research is needed.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Variation in prescription duration for long term conditions: a cohort study in English NHS primary care using OpenPrescribing 94%
- Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers 93%
- Trends and variation in unsafe prescribing of methotrexate: a cohort study in English NHS primary care. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: A protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 96%
- Evaluating Diuretics in Normal Care (EVIDENCE): A feasibility report of a pilot cluster randomised trial of prescribing policy in primary care to compare the effectiveness of thiazide-type diuretics in hypertension 95%
- A complex ePrescribing-based Anti-Microbial Stewardship (ePAMS+) intervention for hospitals combining technological and behavioural components: protocol for a feasibility trial 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-medical prescribing policy in the United Kingdom National Health Service: systematic review and narrative synthesis 94%
- Beyond social prescribing - the use of social return on investment (SROI) analysis in integrated health and social care interventions in England and Wales: a protocol for a systematic review 93%
- Hospital at home: a systematic review of how medication management is conceptualised, described and implemented in practice – a study protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the General Practice Pharmacist (GPP) intervention to optimise prescribing in Irish primary care: a non-randomised pilot study 95%
- Risks of use and non-use of antibiotics in primary care. Qualitative study of prescribers' views 94%
- Perceptions, views and practices regarding antibiotic prescribing and stewardship among hospital physicians in Jakarta, Indonesia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on community antibiotic prescribing and stewardship: a qualitative interview study with general practitioners in England 94%
- Knowledge awareness and practice with antimicrobial stewardship programmes among healthcare providers in a Ghanaian Tertiary Hospital 92%
- Exploration of clinical breakpoint of Danofloxacin for Glaesserella parasuis in plasma and in PELF 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.