The Genetic Determinants and Genomic Consequences of Non-Leukemogenic Somatic Point Mutations
Weinstock, J. S.; Chaudhry, S. A.; Ioannou, M.; Viskadourou, M.; Reventun, P.; Jakubek, Y. A.; Liggett, L. A.; Laurie, C.; Broome, J. G.; Khan, A.; Taylor, K. D.; Guo, X.; Peyser, P. A.; Boerwinkle, E.; Chami, N.; Kenny, E. E.; Loos, R. J..; Psaty, B. M.; Tracy, R. P.; Brody, J. A.; Yun, J. H.; Cho, M. H.; Vasan, R. S.; Kardia, S. L..; Smith, J. A.; Raffield, L. M.; Bidulescu, A.; O'Brien, E.; de Andrade, M.; Rotter, J. I.; Rich, S. S.; Chen, Y. D. I.; Gu, C. C.; Hsiung, C. A.; Kooperberg, C.; Haring, B.; Nassir, R.; Mathias, R.; Reiner, A.; Sankaran, V.; Lowenstein, C. J.; Blackwell, T. W.; A
Show abstract
Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is defined by the expansion of a lineage of genetically identical cells in blood. Genetic lesions that confer a fitness advantage, such as point mutations or mosaic chromosomal alterations (mCAs) in genes associated with hematologic malignancy, are frequent mediators of CH. However, recent analyses of both single cell-derived colonies of hematopoietic cells and population sequencing cohorts have revealed CH frequently occurs in the absence of known driver genetic lesions. To characterize CH without known driver genetic lesions, we used 51,399 deeply sequenced whole genomes from the NHLBI TOPMed sequencing initiative to perform simultaneous germline and somatic mutation analyses among individuals without leukemogenic point mutations (LPM), which we term CH-LPMneg. We quantified CH by estimating the total mutation burden. Because estimating somatic mutation burden without a paired-tissue sample is challenging, we developed a novel statistical method, the Genomic and Epigenomic informed Mutation (GEM) rate, that uses external genomic and epigenomic data sources to distinguish artifactual signals from true somatic mutations. We performed a genome-wide association study of GEM to discover the germline determinants of CH-LPMneg. After fine-mapping and variant-to-gene analyses, we identified seven genes associated with CH-LPMneg (TCL1A, TERT, SMC4, NRIP1, PRDM16, MSRA, SCARB1), and one locus associated with a sex-associated mutation pathway (SRGAP2C). We performed a secondary analysis excluding individuals with mCAs, finding that the genetic architecture was largely unaffected by their inclusion. Functional analyses of SMC4 and NRIP1 implicated altered HSC self-renewal and proliferation as the primary mediator of mutation burden in blood. We then performed comprehensive multi-tissue transcriptomic analyses, finding that the expression levels of 404 genes are associated with GEM. Finally, we performed phenotypic association meta-analyses across four cohorts, finding that GEM is associated with increased white blood cell count and increased risk for incident peripheral artery disease, but is not significantly associated with incident stroke or coronary disease events. Overall, we develop GEM for quantifying mutation burden from WGS without a paired-tissue sample and use GEM to discover the genetic, genomic, and phenotypic correlates of CH-LPMneg.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide analyses of 200,453 individuals yields new insights into the causes and consequences of clonal hematopoiesis 98%
- Cell type-specific consequences of mosaic structural variants in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells 97%
- Systematic assessment of regulatory effects of human disease variants in pluripotent cells 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Colocalization of blood cell traits GWAS associations and variation in PU.1 genomic occupancy prioritizes causal noncoding regulatory variants 97%
- Gene regulatory network inference from CRISPR perturbations in primary CD4+ T cells elucidates the genomic basis of immune disease 97%
- Scalable Screening of Ternary-Code DNA methylation Dynamics Associated with Human Traits. 97%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.