Back

δ-α cell-to-cell interactions modulate pancreatic islet Ca2+ oscillation modes

Tang, C.; Ren, H.; Li, Y.; Xie, B.; Qian, W.; Yu, Y.; Chang, T.; Yang, X.; sneppen, k.; Chen, L.

2024-08-22 systems biology
10.1101/2024.08.21.608986 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glucose-induced pancreatic islet hormone release is tightly coupled with oscillations in cytoplasmic free Ca2+ concentration of islet cells, which is regulated by a complex interplay between intercellular and intracellular signaling. {delta} cells, which entangle with cells located at the islet periphery, are known to be important paracrine regulators. However, the role of {delta} cells in regulating Ca2+ oscillation pattern remains unclear. Here we show that {delta}- cell-to-cell interactions are the source of variability in glucose-induced Ca2+ oscillation pattern. Somatostatin secreted from {delta} cells prolonged the islets oscillation period in an cell mass-dependent manner. Pharmacological and optogenetic perturbations of {delta}- interactions led islets to switch between fast and slow Ca2+ oscillations. Continuous adjustment of {delta}- coupling strength caused the fast oscillating islets to transition to mixed and slow oscillations. We developed a mathematical model, demonstrating that the fast-mixed-slow oscillation transition is a Hopf bifurcation. Our findings provide a comprehensive understanding of how {delta} cells modulate islet Ca2+ dynamics and reveal the intrinsic heterogeneity of islets due to the structural composition of different cell types. HighlightsO_LISomatostatin slows down islet Ca2+ oscillations in an cell mass-dependent manner. C_LIO_LIPharmacological and optogenetic perturbations of {delta}- interaction cause islet Ca2+ oscillation mode switching. C_LIO_LIContinuous tuning of {delta}- interaction strength induces fast-mixed-slow oscillation transition successively. C_LIO_LIMathematical modeling shows the fast-mixed-slow oscillation transition as a Hopf bifurcation. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.3%
2
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
7.3%
4
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.4%
6
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.4%
7
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.0%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.1%
9
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
11
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
12
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
14
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
29 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
16
Cell Communication and Signaling
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
20
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.5%