Reply to: Eigenmodes of the brain: revisiting connectomics and geometry
Pang, J. C.; Aquino, K. M.; Oldehinkel, M.; Robinson, P. A.; Fulcher, B. D.; Breakspear, M.; Fornito, A.
Show abstract
In Pang, Aquino et al. (2023)1, we presented multiple lines of evidence to indicate that brain geometry plays a previously under-appreciated role in shaping dynamics. Mansour et al. raise concerns about one specific analysis, in which we showed that eigenmodes derived from the geometry of the human cortex can reconstruct diverse activity maps generated with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) better than eigenmodes derived from connectomes estimated with diffusion MRI (dMRI). Here, we address their concerns and show how our findings and conclusions remain valid.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the sensitivity of functional connectivity measures to motion artifact in resting-state fMRI data 95%
- Personalized whole-brain Ising models with heterogeneous nodes capture differences among brain regions 95%
- The connectome spectrum as a canonical basis for a sparse representation of fast brain activity 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spectral graph model for fMRI: a biophysical, connectivity-based generative model for the analysis of frequency-resolved resting state fMRI 94%
- Dynamical models reveal anatomically reliable attractor landscapes embedded in resting state brain networks 94%
- A hierarchical Bayesian brain parcellation framework for fusion of functional imaging datasets 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.