Protein stability models fail to capture epistatic interactions of double point mutations
Dieckhaus, H.; Kuhlman, B.
Show abstract
There is strong interest in accurate methods for predicting changes in protein stability resulting from amino acid mutations to the protein sequence. Recombinant proteins must often be stabilized to be used as therapeutics or reagents, and destabilizing mutations are implicated in a variety of diseases. Due to increased data availability and improved modeling techniques, recent studies have shown advancements in predicting changes in protein stability when a single point mutation is made. Less focus has been directed toward predicting changes in protein stability when there are two or more mutations, despite the significance of mutation clusters for disease pathways and protein design studies. Here, we analyze the largest available dataset of double point mutation stability and benchmark several widely used protein stability models on this and other datasets. We identify a blind spot in how predictors are typically evaluated on multiple mutations, finding that, contrary to assumptions in the field, current stability models are unable to consistently capture epistatic interactions between double mutations. We observe one notable deviation from this trend, which is that epistasis-aware models provide marginally better predictions on stabilizing double point mutations. We develop an extension of the ThermoMPNN framework for double mutant modeling as well as a novel data augmentation scheme which mitigates some of the limitations in available datasets. Collectively, our findings indicate that current protein stability models fail to capture the nuanced epistatic interactions between concurrent mutations due to several factors, including training dataset limitations and insufficient model sensitivity. SignificanceProtein stability is governed in part by epistatic interactions between energetically coupled residues. Prediction of these couplings represents the next frontier in protein stability modeling. In this work, we benchmark protein stability models on a large dataset of double point mutations and identify previously overlooked limitations in model design and evaluation. We also introduce several new strategies to improve modeling of epistatic couplings between protein point mutations.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- ProBASS: a language model with sequence and structural features for predicting the effect of mutations on binding affinity 97%
- CaLMPhosKAN: Prediction of General Phosphorylation Sites in Proteins via Fusion of Codon Aware Embeddings with Amino Acid Aware Embeddings and Wavelet-based Kolmogorov Arnold Network 96%
- Deep Local Analysis deconstructs protein-protein interfaces and accurately estimates binding affinity changes upon mutation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural Network-Derived Potts Models for Structure-Based Protein Design using Backbone Atomic Coordinates and Tertiary Motifs 98%
- COLLAPSE: A representation learning framework for identification and characterization of protein structural sites 97%
- Learning deep representations of enzyme thermal adaptation 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.