Evaluation of the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS and YiDiXie™-HS in colorectal cancer
Li, X.; Sun, C.; Xiong, R.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, H.; Ge, Z.; Li, Y.; Chen, W.; Wang, W.; Zhang, P.; Lin, S.; Chen, S.; Li, W.; Lv, G.; Ji, L.; Lai, Y.
Show abstract
BackgroundColorectal cancer poses a severe risk to public health and has a substantial financial impact. Tumor markers such as CEA, CA125, CA19-9, and others, as well as the fecal occult blood test (FOBT), are frequently utilized for colorectal cancer screening and initial diagnosis. However, false-positive results of FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 can lead to misdiagnosis and wrong colorectaloscopy, while their false-negative results can lead to missed diagnosis and delayed treatment. Finding practical, affordable, and non-invasive diagnostic techniques is crucial to lowering the false-positive and false-negative rates of FOBT and other indicators. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of YiDiXie-SS, YiDiXie-HS and YiDiXie-D in colorectal cancer. Patients and methodsThis study eventually included 916 participants (602 in the malignant group and 314 in the benign group). Serum samples from individuals were obtained and examined using the YiDiXie all-cancer detection kit to assess the sensitivity and specificity of YiDiXie-SS, YiDiXie-HS and YiDiXie-D, respectively. ResultsThe sensitivity of YiDiXie-SS was 99.0% (95% CI: 97.8% - 99.5%) and its specificity was 63.1% (95% CI: 57.6% - 68.2%). This means that YiDiXie -SS has an extremely high sensitivity and relatively high specificity in colorectal tumors.YiDiXie-HS has a sensitivity of 93.7% (95% CI: 91.5% - 95.4%) and a specificity of 86.3% (95% CI: 82.1% - 89.7%). This means that YiDiXie-HS has high sensitivity and specificity in colorectal tumors.YiDiXie-D has a sensitivity of 82.6% (95% CI: 79.3% - 85.4%) and a specificity of 93.9% (95% CI: 90.7% - 96.1%). This means that YiDiXie -D has relatively high sensitivity and very high specificity in colorectal tumors. YiDiXie -SS significantly reduced the false-positive rates of FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 with essentially no increase in malignancy leakage. YiDiXie-HS substantially reduced the false-negative rates of FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9. YiDiXie-D significantly reduces the false positive rate of FOBT, CEA, CA125, CA19-9. YiDiXie-D significantly reduces the false negative rate of FOBT, CEA, CA125, CA19-9 while maintaining a high level of specificity. ConclusionYiDiXie-SS has very high sensitivity and relatively high specificity in colorectal tumors.YiDiXie-HS has high sensitivity and high specificity in colorectal tumors.YiDiXie-D has relatively high sensitivity and very high specificity in colorectal tumors. YiDiXie -SS significantly reduced false-positive rates for FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 with essentially no increase in delayed treatment for colorectal cancer.YiDiXie-HS substantially reduced false-negative rates for FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9. YiDiXie-D can significantly reduce the false-positive rate of FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9, or significantly reduce the false-negative rate of FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 while maintaining a high level of specificity. YiDiXie tests have an important diagnostic value in colorectal cancer, and are expected to solve the problems of "high false-positive rate" and "high false-negative rate" of FOBT, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9. Clinical trial numberChiCTR2200066840.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning based prediction of recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer 96%
- Classification of early and late stage Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma patients from their genomics and epigenomics profiles. 95%
- Comprehensive analysis of prostate cancer life expectancy, loss of life expectancy, and healthcare expenditures: Taiwan national cohort study spanning 2008 to 2019 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Demarcation line determination for diagnosis of gastric cancer disease range using unsupervised machine learning in magnifying narrow-band imaging 94%
- Identification of prognostic biomarkers for suppressing tumorigenesis and metastasis of Hepatocellular carcinoma through transcriptome analysis 93%
- Detection, Isolation and Quantification of Myocardial Infarct with Four Different Histological Staining Techniques 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of different environmental intervention durations on the intestinal mucosal barrier and the brain-gut axis in rats with colorectal cancer 95%
- Combined DeRitis ratio and alkaline phosphatase on the Prediction of Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma 95%
- Genetic Risk Factors for Colorectal Cancer in Multiethnic Indonesians 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- DNMT family induced down-regulation of NDRG1 via DNA methylation and clinicopathological significance in gastric cancer 95%
- Ursolic acid improves the bacterial community mapping of the intestinal tract in liver fibrosis mice 94%
- A machine learning approach for identification of gastrointestinal predictors for the risk of COVID-19 related hospitalization 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of Fasting the Holy Month of Ramadan on Colorectal Cancer Patients and Two Tumor Biomarkers: A Tertiary-Care Hospital Experience 95%
- Post mortem pathological findings in COVID-19 cases: A Systematic Review 93%
- Impact of Losartan on Portal hypertension and Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.