Back

Using Functional Genomic Data in Monocytes/Macrophages and Genotyping to Nominate Disease-Driving Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Target Genes in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Haley, E. K.; Barshad, G.; He, A.; Rice, E. J.; Sudman, M.; Thompson, S. D.; Crinzi, E. A.; Jiang, K.; Danko, C. G.; Jarvis, J. N.

2024-08-19 genetics
10.1101/2024.08.19.608312 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionGWAS have identified multiple regions that confer risk for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). However, identifying the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that drive disease risk is impeded by the SNPs that identify risk loci being in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with hundreds of other SNPs. Since the causal SNPs remain unknown, it is difficult to identify target genes and use genetic information to inform patient care. We used genotyping and functional data in primary human monocytes/macrophages to nominate disease-driving SNPs on JIA risk haplotypes and identify their likely target genes. MethodsWe identified JIA risk haplotypes using Immunochip data from Hinks et al (Nature Gen 2013) and the meta-analysis from McIntosh et al (Arthritis Rheum 2017). We used genotyping data from 3,939 children with JIA and 14,412 healthy controls to identify SNPs that: (1) were situated within open chromatin in multiple immune cell types and (2) were more common in children with JIA than the controls (p< 0.05). We intersected the chosen SNPs (n=846) with regions of bi-directional transcription initiation characteristic of non-coding regulatory regions detected using dREG to analyze GRO-seq data. Finally, we used MicroC data to identify gene promoters interacting with the regulatory regions harboring the candidate causal SNPs. ResultsWe identified 190 SNPs that overlap with dREG peaks in monocytes and126 SNPs that overlap with dREG peaks in macrophages. Of these SNPs, 101 were situated within dREG peaks in both monocytes and macrophages, suggesting that these SNPs exert their effects independent of the cellular activation state. MicroC data in monocytes identified 20 genes/transcripts whose promoters interact with the enhancers harboring the SNPs of interest. ConclusionSNPs in JIA risk regions that are candidate causal variants can be further screened using functional data such as GRO-seq. This process identifies a finite number of candidate causal SNPs, the majority of which are likely to exert their biological effects independent of cellular activation state in monocytes. Three-dimensional chromatin data generated with MicroC identifies genes likely to be influenced by these SNPs. These studies demonstrate the importance of investigations into the role of innate immunity in JIA.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Human Molecular Genetics
141 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
2
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.8%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.5%
4
Genes & Immunity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
6
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.4%
7
Epigenetics & Chromatin
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.2%
9
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
10
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
11
Epigenetics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
12
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.1%
14
Human Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
European Journal of Human Genetics
58 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
17
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
18
Arthritis & Rheumatology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
187 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.9%
23
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
25
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
26
The Journal of Immunology
166 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%