Back

Different treatment durations of loperamide in preventing pyrotinib-induced diarrhea: A randomized, parallel-group sub-study of the phase II PHAEDRA trial

Wang, C.; Lin, Y.; Xu, Y.; Mao, F.; Guan, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Shen, S.; Zhong, Y.; Pan, B.; Peng, L.; Huang, X.; Cao, X.; Yao, R.; Zhou, X.; He, Z.; Liu, Y.; Lang, J.; Li, C.; Zhou, Y.; Sun, Q.

2024-08-20 oncology
10.1101/2024.08.19.24311958 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPyrotinib, a pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, demonstrates efficacy in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. However, the frequent occurrence of treatment-emergent diarrhea necessitating discontinuation, impacts patient outcomes. MethodsIn this multicenter, open-label, phase II PHAEDRA study enrolling early stage HER2-positive patients for postoperative treatment with nab-paclitaxel and pyrotinib, 120 patients were included in a sub-study and randomly divided into two groups to receive 21 days and 42 days of loperamide for primary prophylaxis of diarrhea, followed by as-needed usage. The primary outcome was the incidence of grade [≥]3 diarrhea. ResultsFifty-eight patients in the 21-day group and 59 patients in the 42-day group received at least one dose of pyrotinib. With a median follow-up of 12.1 months, all patients experienced diarrhea of any grade, with grade [≥]3 events in 39.7% of the 21-day group and 42.4% of the 42-day group (relative risk: 0.94; 95% confidence interval: 0.61-1.45). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events, other than diarrhea, were hypoesthesia, vomiting, nausea, and rash, mostly grade 1-2, except for one patient with a grade [≥]3 decreased neutrophil count in each group. ConclusionNo significant differences were observed between 21-day and 42-day loperamide durations in preventing grade [≥]3 diarrhea. Considering the economic cost and patient compliance, 21-day loperamide prophylaxis might represent a more pragmatic and appropriate approach for clinical application. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04659499

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.6%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.3%
5
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
6
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.7%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
9
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
11
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
12
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
17
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
18
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
19
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
22
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
28
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%