Back

High-Resolution Spatial Mapping of Electrocorticographic Activities with a 4096-Channel, Multiplexed Thin-Film Transistor Array

Sheng, X.

2024-08-19 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.08.18.608446 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Advanced brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) demand implantable devices that offer flexibility, high-density and high-throughput capabilities. Conventional neural electrodes are constrained by the wiring strategy. Here we present a flexible and implantable electrocorticography (ECoG) device array (NeuroCam) based on metal-oxide semiconductor thin-film transistors (TFTs), to record brain activities at a large scale. Employing a multiplexing technique, the system is capable to record ECoG signals with up to 4096 channels and a density of 44 sites/mm2, while compressing the fan-in/fan-out leads to around a hundred. In a rabbit model with epilepsy, the NeuroCam array maps abnormal spike-wave discharges with an exceptional spatial resolution (150 m) across extensive brain areas. The device strategy provides a promising route towards high-throughput BMIs with potential applications in fundamental neuroscience studies and practical biomedicine. Significance StatementDeveloping high-throughput neural recording techniques is critical for next-generation brain-machine interfaces (BMIs), but conventional neural electrodes are limited by the difficulty of scaling the lead wires. Here we report an implantable neural interface, based on a flexible thin-film transistor (TFT) array named NeuroCam. Employing an actively switching (multiplexing) technique, NeuroCam is capable to record electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals with up to 4096 channels and a density of 44 sites/mm2, with only 128 input/output leads. Validated in a rabbit model of epilepsy, NeuroCam records spatially resolved neural activities across extensive cortical areas with a resolution of 150 m, and precisely maps the temporal evolution of epileptic waves. NeuroCam shows a promising solution for high-performance BMIs.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.