Chromosome breakage-replication/fusion enables rapid DNA amplification
Zhang, C.-Z.; Pellman, D.
Show abstract
DNA rearrangements are thought to arise from two classes of processes. The first class involves DNA breakage and fusion ("cut-and-paste") without net DNA gain or loss. The second class involves aberrant DNA replication ("copy-and-paste") and can produce either net DNA gain or loss. We previously demonstrated that the partitioning of chromosomes into aberrant structures of the nucleus, micronuclei or chromosome bridges, can generate cut-and-paste rearrangements by chromosome fragmentation and ligation. Surprisingly, in the progeny clones of single cells that have undergone chromosome bridge breakage, we identified large segmental duplications and short sequence insertions that are commonly attributed to copy-and-paste processes. Here, we demonstrate that both large duplications and short insertions are inherent outcomes of the replication and fusion of unligated DNA ends, a process we term breakage-replication/fusion (B-R/F). We propose that B-R/F provides a unifying explanation for complex rearrangement patterns including chromothripsis and chromoanasynthesis and enables rapid DNA amplification after chromosome fragmentation.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancer adoption by an LTR retrotransposongenerates viral-like particles causingdevelopmental limb phenotypes 98%
- Orphan CpG islands boost the regulatory activity of poisedenhancers and dictate the responsiveness of their target genes 98%
- Boundary stacking interactions enable cross-TAD enhancer-promoter communication during limb development 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancer activation from transposable elements in extrachromosomal DNA 98%
- Cohesin regulates homology search during recombinational DNA repair 98%
- Arabidopsis REM transcription factors and GDE1 shape the DNA methylation landscape through the recruitment of RNA Polymerase IV transcription complexes. 98%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.