Back

Species-specific interactions with apex carnivores yield unique benefits and burdens for mesocarnivores

Binder, W.; Rabe, J.; Lowe, Z.; Scott, G.; Lacey, C.; King, E.; Stahler, D. R.; Chakrabarti, S.

2024-08-19 ecology
10.1101/2024.08.17.608414 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mesocarnivores navigate a complex risk-reward continuum in ecosystems shared with their apex counterparts, balancing scavenging opportunities with risks of mortality. However, the risks to mesocarnivores in multi-carnivore systems are not uniform--often varying with specific apex-meso pairings. Using camera traps and GPS-telemetry, we examined space-use, temporal activity, fine-scale interactions, and scavenging behavior of apex (wolves, cougars) and mesocarnivores (red foxes, coyotes) in northern Yellowstone National Park, USA. Coyote space use was positively linked to wolf presence, while red fox space use was positively linked to cougar presence. Notably, photo-detection rates of mesocarnivores doubled within 24 hours of apex carnivore detections--except for coyotes following cougars. Coyotes were more frequent scavengers at wolf and cougar kills than red foxes, but they also suffered the highest mortality rates. Over 60% of wolf caused coyote mortalities were linked to wolf kill-sites, though wolves rarely consumed the coyotes themselves. In contrast, cougars hunted and consumed coyotes as prey, posing an additional risk of predation. These findings highlight how divergent hunting strategies and habitat preferences between canid and felid apex carnivores create separate risks for mesocarnivores. Our study offers new insights into the species-specific behavioral dynamics that can shape trophic interactions in multi-carnivore systems.

Published in Ecology (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.