Back

Sex differences and behaviour in the pace-of-life of rodents

Hughes, B.; Mastromonaco, G.; Bowman, J.; Schulte-Hostedde, A.

2024-08-19 ecology
10.1101/2024.08.15.608175 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Male and female rodents experience different selective pressures associated with reproductive costs. Thus, we may expect the expression of different Pace-of-life (POL) strategies between sexes. Further, the pace-of-life syndrome (POLS) hypothesis and anisogamy predict differences in the costs of gamete production, where variation in life history trait expression should follow a fast-slow continuum such that males and females might exist on opposite ends of the spectrum. However, males and females could express a similar POL strategy in systems where the reproductive costs are consistent between sexes or where selective pressures force a similar directionality of traits. We used standardized behavioural tests and fecal glucocorticoid metabolite (FGM) concentrations to measure potential differences in POL strategies among three rodent species in Algonquin Provincial Park. We hypothesized that differences in reproductive costs between males and females would result in differences in POL traits along the fast-slow continuum. We predicted that males would express more explorative behaviours and have a higher level FGMs than female counterparts. We found little support for the POLS hypothesis between sexes. Instead, we suggest that the species observed may express a similar directionality of selection for the observed behavioural traits, where both sexes express similar relationships in POL. Thus, some male rodents may be more explorative to accommodate the increase of energetic stress associated with mate acquisition, while females may share similar trait expressions to accommodate the increased metabolic demand for the care and development of young. Significance statementDocility and exploration are measurements of how species or individuals react to novel and sometimes risky stimuli. Further, reproduction is an energetically expensive and inherently risky process. In seasonally breeding rodents, males often invest in fast pace-of-life behaviours that accommodate an increased necessity to disperse and find a mate. Meanwhile, females often invest in metabolically expensive physiological processes, including pregnancy and lactate development, increased protection of the young and the need for self-maintenance. Using a series of behavioural tests and fecal glucocorticoid metabolites (FGMs), we measured the relationship between metabolic stress, docility and exploration in three species of rodents during the breeding season. We observed consistent relationships in behaviour and FGMs, indicating uniformity between sexes regarding these behaviours. We posit that the costs associated with mate acquisition for males and the care and development of young for females can influence similar behavioural strategies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
General and Comparative Endocrinology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.5%
2
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.9%
3
Hormones and Behavior
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
6
Behavioral Ecology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
7
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
11
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
13
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.1%
20
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.0%
22
Journal of Avian Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
23
Journal of Thermal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
24
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
25
Ibis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
28
American Journal of Primatology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%