Back

Headwinds to Understanding Stress Response Physiology: A Systematic Review Reveals Mismatch between Real and Simulated Marine Heatwaves

Martell, H. A.; Donner, S. D.

2024-08-19 ecology
10.1101/2024.08.15.608043 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Laboratory experiments have long been used to guide predictions of organismal stress in response to our rapidly changing climate. However, the ability to simulate real world conditions in the laboratory can be a major barrier to prediction accuracy, creating obstacles to efforts informing ecosystem conservation and management. Capitalizing on an extensive experimental literature of coral bleaching physiology, we performed a systematic review of the literature and assembled a database to identify the methods being used to measure coral bleaching in heating experiments and assess how closely heating experiments resembled marine heatwaves (MHWs) on coral reefs. Observations of the maximum photochemical yield of Photosystem II (FV/FM), though not a direct measure of bleaching, vastly outnumbered Symbiodiniaceae density and chlorophyll (g cm-2, pg cell-1) observations in the available literature, indicating the widespread misuse of FV/FM as a proxy for coral bleaching. Laboratory studies in our database used significantly higher maximum temperatures, degree heating times ([~] 1.7 x) and heating rates ([~] 7.3 x), and significantly shorter durations ([~] 1.5 x), than MHWs on coral reefs. We then asked whether exposure differences between lab and reef altered the relationship between coral bleaching and heating metrics using the example of hormesis, the biphasic dose response wherein low to moderate doses elicit some benefit, while high doses are deleterious. We fit curves on the data both with and without ecologically relevant heating metrics and found hormetic curves in some response variables were altered with the exclusion of exposures that fell outside of the bounds of MHWs on coral reefs. Differences between lab exposures and real-world MHWs were large enough to alter the relationships, indicating a high likelihood of prediction error. We recommend laboratory-based studies of coral bleaching use ecologically relevant exposures to improve our predictions of the coral physiological response to our rapidly warming oceans.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.4%
2
Coral Reefs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
3
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
5
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
6
Marine Ecology Progress Series
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
8
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
9
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.9%
11
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.5%
13
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
15
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
16
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
17
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
19
Limnology and Oceanography
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
22
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%