Precision Network Modeling of TMS Across Individuals Suggests Therapeutic Targets and Potential for Improvement
Sun, W.; Billot, A.; Du, J.; Wei, X.; Lemley, R. A.; Daneshzand, M.; Nummenmaa, A.; Buckner, R. L.; Eldaief, M. C.
Show abstract
Higher-order cognitive and affective functions are supported by large-scale networks in the brain. Dysfunction in different networks is proposed to associate with distinct symptoms in neuropsychiatric disorders. However, the specific networks targeted by current clinical transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) approaches are unclear. While standard-of-care TMS relies on scalp-based landmarks, recent FDA-approved TMS protocols use individualized functional connectivity with the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) to optimize TMS targeting. Leveraging previous work on precision network estimation and recent advances in network-level TMS targeting, we demonstrate that clinical TMS approaches target different functional networks between individuals. Homotopic scalp positions (left F3 and right F4) target different networks within and across individuals, and right F4 generally favors a right-lateralized control network. We also modeled the impact of targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) zone anticorrelated with the sgACC and found that the individual-specific anticorrelated region variably targets a network coupled to reward circuitry. Combining individualized, precision network mapping and electric field (E-field) modeling, we further illustrate how modeling can be deployed to prospectively target distinct closely localized association networks in the dlPFC with meaningful spatial selectivity and E-field intensity and retrospectively assess network engagement. Critically, we demonstrate the feasibility and reliability of this approach in an independent cohort of participants (including those with Major Depressive Disorder) who underwent repeated sessions of TMS to distinct networks, with precise targeting derived from a low-burden single session of data. Lastly, our findings emphasize differences between selectivity and maximal intensity, highlighting the need to consider both metrics in precision TMS efforts.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcranial ultrasound stimulation effect in the redundant and synergistic networks consistent across macaques 95%
- Evaluating oscillatory mechanisms underlying flexible neural communication in the human brain 94%
- The Motion Sensitivity and Predictive Utility of Different Estimates of Inter-regional Functional Coupling in Resting-state Functional MRI. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence for immediate enhancement of hippocampal memory encoding by network-targeted theta-burst stimulation during concurrent fMRI 96%
- Electrical stimulation of temporal and limbic circuitry produces distinct responses in human ventral temporal cortex 95%
- Signatures of electrical stimulation driven network interactions in the human limbic system 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.