Disentangling the drivers of heterogeneity in SARS-CoV-2 transmission from data on viral load and daily contact rates
Quilty, B. J.; Chapman, L. A.; Munday, J. D.; Wong, K. L.; Gimma, A.; Pickering, S.; Neil, S. J.; Galao, R.; Edmunds, W. J.; Jarvis, C. I.; Kucharski, A. J.; CMMID COVID-19 Working Group,
Show abstract
SARS-CoV-2 spreads predominantly through superspreading, with a minority of individuals responsible for the majority of transmission, though the drivers of this heterogeneity are unclear. Here, we assess the contribution of variation in viral load and daily contact rates to this heterogeneity by combining viral load and contact survey data in a mathematical model to estimate the secondary infection distribution. Using data from the BBC Pandemic and CoMix contact surveys, we estimate the basic reproduction number (R0 = 2.2, 95% CI 2.1-2.2) from first principles and the secondary infection distribution throughout the pandemic in the UK in 2020, and the effectiveness of frequent and pre-event rapid testing for reducing superspreading events. We find that individual heterogeneity in contacts - rather than individual heterogeneity in shedding - drives observed heterogeneity in the secondary infection distribution. Our results suggest that regular testing every 3 days, or pre-event testing with a minimum event size of 10, could reduce the mean reproduction number below 1 with moderate to high levels of uptake (60-80%) for pre-pandemic contact levels. This work demonstrates the potential for using viral load and contact data to predict heterogeneity in transmission and the effectiveness of rapid testing strategies for curbing transmission in future pandemics.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying within-school SARS-CoV-2 transmission and the impact of lateral flow testing in secondary schools in England 96%
- Behaviour, booster vaccines and waning immunity: modelling the medium-term dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in England in the Omicron era 96%
- Estimating the potential impact and diagnostic requirements for SARS-CoV-2 test-and-treat programs 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling pooling strategies for SARS-CoV-2 testing in a university setting 92%
- Date of introduction and epidemiologic patterns of SARS-CoV-2 in Mogadishu, Somalia: estimates from transmission modelling of 2020 excess mortality data 92%
- Estimating required lockdown cycles before immunity to SARS-CoV-2: Model-based analyses of susceptible population sizes, S0, in seven European countries including the UK and Ireland 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of vaccination and non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 dynamics in Switzerland 95%
- Correlation between times to SARS-CoV-2 symptom onset and secondary transmission undermines epidemic control efforts 94%
- Determinants of RSV epidemiology following suppression through pandemic contact restrictions 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping social distancing measures to the reproduction number for COVID-19 96%
- The Population Attributable Fraction (PAF) of cases due to gatherings and groups with relevance to COVID-19 mitigation strategies 92%
- Exploring surveillance data biases when estimating the reproduction number: with insights into subpopulation transmission of Covid-19 in England 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.