Back

Predicting microscale beat patterns from nanoscale chemomechanics in eukaryotic flagella

Cass, J. F.; Bloomfield-Gadelha, H.

2024-08-14 biophysics
10.1101/2024.08.14.607876 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We present quantitative predictions for experimental observables--amplitude, frequency and wavelength--of the eukaryotic flagellar beat in terms of underlying molecular chemomechanical parameters. Flagellar beating, an incompletely understood self-organized process arising from the collective action of dynein molecular motors, is modelled as a reaction-diffusion (RD) system with an oscillatory instability arising from motor-induced microtubule sliding. While the RD model accurately reproduces beating patterns of bull spermatozoa and C. Reinhardtii, existing linear analyses and simulations are unable to provide a complete framework for understanding nonlinear waveform formation. Here, we derive analytical expressions that reveal the nonlinear dependence of beat characteristics on parameters such as motor binding duty ratio, stepping velocity, and axonemal resistance. Our analysis uncovers a novel out-of-equilibrium mechanism for base-to-tip wave propagation, involving an interference pattern between unstable standing wave modes that generates travelling waves. Predicted beat patterns agree remarkably with numerical simulations, even far from the critical point marking the onset of oscillations. This unveils key molecular parameters that govern oscillation initiation, amplitude saturation, frequency shifts, and the spatial phase gradient crucial for generating propulsive hydrodynamic force. Our results yield biophysical understanding of how molecular interactions shape flagellar beating patterns, allowing for the inference of molecular properties from macroscopic observations. This challenges existing hypotheses on wave generation and demonstrates the power of nonlinear analysis to uncover new phenomena beyond the reach of linear models and computational studies alone.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.2%
2
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.4%
4
Physical Review Letters
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.5%
6
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.1%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.6%
8
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
9
Soft Matter
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
11
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
12
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
13
New Journal of Physics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.1%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
16
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.8%
18
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Physical Review X
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
The Journal of Chemical Physics
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
23
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.6%