Back

Age-dependent cortical overconnectivity revers under anesthesia in Shank3 mice

Montagni, E.; Ambrosone, M.; Martello, A.; Curti, L.; Baroncelli, L.; Mannaioni, G.; Pavone, F.; Masi, A.; Allegra Mascaro, A. L.

2024-08-16 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.08.13.607775 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Growing evidence points to brain network dysfunction as a central neurobiological basis for autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). As a result, studies on Functional Connectivity (FC) have become pivotal for understanding the large-scale network alterations associated with ASD. Despite ASD being a neurodevelopmental disorder, and FC being significantly influenced by the brain state, existing FC studies in mouse models predominantly focus on adult subjects under anesthesia. The differential impact of anesthesia and age on cortical functional networks in ASD subjects remains unexplored. To fill this gap, we conducted a longitudinal evaluation of FC across three brain states and three ages in the Shank3b mouse model of autism. We utilized wide-field calcium imaging to monitor cortical activity in Shank3b+/- and Shank3b+/+ mice fromlate development (P45) through adulthood (P90), and isoflurane anesthesia to manipulate the brain state. Our findings reveal that network hyperconnectivity, emerging from the barrel-field cortices during the juvenile stage, progressively expands to encompass the entire dorsal cortex in adult Shank3b+/- mice. Notably, the severity of FC imbalance is highly dependent on the brain state: network alterations are more pronounced in the awake state and shift towards hypoconnectivity under anesthesia. These results underscore the crucial role of anesthesia in detecting autism-related FC alterations and identify a significant network of early cortical dysfunction associated with autism. This network represents a potential target for non-invasive translational treatments.

Published in Translational Psychiatry (predicted rank #22) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.