Back

Identification of In Vivo Internalizing Cardiac-Specific RNA Aptamers

Narayan, C.; Lin, L.-H.; Barros, M. B.; Gilbert, T. C.; Brown, C. R.; Reddin, D.; London, B.; Chen, Y.; Wilson, M. E.; Streeter, J.; Thiel, W.

2024-08-14 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.08.13.607054 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe pursuit of selective therapeutic delivery to target tissue types represents a key goal in the treatment of a range of adverse health issues, including diseases afflicting the heart. The development of new cardiac-specific ligands is a crucial step towards effectively targeting therapeutics to the heart. MethodsUtilizing an ex vivo and in vivo SELEX approaches, we enriched a library of 2-fluoro modified aptamers for ventricular cardiomyocyte specificity. Lead candidates were identified from this library, and their binding and internalization into cardiomyocytes was evaluated in both ex vivo and in vivo mouse studies. ResultsThe ex vivo and in vivo SELEX processes generated an aptamer library with significant cardiac specificity over non-cardiac tissues such as liver and skeletal muscle. Our lead candidate aptamer from this library, CA1, demonstrates selective in vivo targeting and delivery of a fluorophore cargo to ventricular cardiomyocytes within the murine heart, while minimizing off-target localization to non-cardiac tissues, including the liver. By employing a novel RNase-based assay to evaluate aptamer interactions with cardiomyocytes, we discovered that CA1 predominantly internalizes into ventricular cardiomyocytes; conversely, another candidate CA41 primarily binds to the cardiomyocyte cell surface. ConclusionsThese findings suggest that CA1 and CA41 have the potential to be promising candidates for targeted drug delivery and imaging applications in cardiac diseases.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.