Back

Automated Craniofacial Biometry with 3D T2w Fetal MRI

Matthew, J.; Uus, A.; Egloff, A.; Luis, A.; Arulkumaran, S.; Fukami-Gartner, A.; Kyriakopoulou, V.; Cromb, D.; Wright, R.; Colford, K.; Deprez, M.; Hutter, J.; O'Muircheartaigh, J.; Malamateniou, C.; Razavi, R.; Story, L.; Hajnal, J. V.; Rutherford, M. A.

2024-08-14 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2024.08.13.24311408 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesEvaluating craniofacial phenotype-genotype correlations prenatally is increasingly important; however, it is subjective and challenging with 3D ultrasound. We developed an automated landmark propagation pipeline using 3D motion-corrected, slice-to-volume reconstructed (SVR) fetal MRI for craniofacial measurements. MethodsA literature review and expert consensus identified 31 craniofacial biometrics for fetal MRI. An MRI atlas with defined anatomical landmarks served as a template for subject registration, auto-labelling, and biometric calculation. We assessed 108 healthy controls and 24 fetuses with Down syndrome (T21) in the third trimester (29-36 weeks gestational age, GA) to identify meaningful biometrics in T21. Reliability and reproducibility were evaluated in 10 random datasets by four observers. ResultsAutomated labels were produced for all 132 subjects with a 0.03% placement error rate. Seven measurements, including anterior base of skull length and maxillary length, showed significant differences with large effect sizes between T21 and control groups (ANOVA, p<0.001). Manual measurements took 25-35 minutes per case, while automated extraction took approximately 5 minutes. Bland-Altman plots showed agreement within manual observer ranges except for mandibular width, which had higher variability. Extended GA growth charts (19-39 weeks), based on 280 control fetuses, were produced for future research. ConclusionThis is the first automated atlas-based protocol using 3D SVR MRI for fetal craniofacial biometrics, accurately revealing morphological craniofacial differences in a T21 cohort. Future work should focus on improving measurement reliability, larger clinical cohorts, and technical advancements, to enhance prenatal care and phenotypic characterisation.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.