Spatial mapping of immunosuppressive cancer-associated fibroblast gene signatures in H&E-stained images using additive multiple instance learning
Markey, M.; Kim, J.; Goldstein, Z.; Gerardin, Y.; Brosnan-Cashman, J.; Javed, S. A.; Juyal, D.; Padigela, H.; Yu, L.; Rahsepar, B.; Abel, J.; Hennek, S.; Khosla, A.; Taylor-Weiner, A.; Parmar, C.
Show abstract
The relative abundance of cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) subtypes influences a tumors response to treatment, especially immunotherapy. However, the extent to which the underlying tumor composition associates with CAF subtype-specific gene expression is unclear. Here, we describe an interpretable machine learning (ML) approach, additive multiple instance learning (aMIL), to predict bulk gene expression signatures from H&E-stained whole slide images (WSI), focusing on an immunosuppressive LRRC15+ CAF-enriched TGF{beta}-CAF signature. aMIL models accurately predicted TGF{beta}-CAF across various cancer types. Tissue regions contributing most highly to slide-level predictions of TGF{beta}-CAF were evaluated by ML models characterizing spatial distributions of diverse cell and tissue types, stromal subtypes, and nuclear morphology. In breast cancer, regions contributing most to TGF{beta}-CAF-high predictions ("excitatory") were localized to cancer stroma with high fibroblast density and mature collagen fibers. Regions contributing most to TGF{beta}-CAF-low predictions ("inhibitory") were localized to cancer epithelium and densely inflamed stroma. Fibroblast and lymphocyte nuclear morphology also differed between excitatory and inhibitory regions. Thus, aMIL enables a data-driven link between tissue phenotype and transcription, offering biological interpretability beyond typical black-box models.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a gene expression score to account for tumour purity and improve prognostication in breast cancer 96%
- Generalizing AI-driven Assessment of Immunohistochemistry across Immunostains and Cancer Types: A Universal Immunohistochemistry Analyzer 95%
- Single-Cell Spatial Proteomics Analyses of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Reveal Tumor Heterogeneity and Immune Architectures Associated with Clinical Outcome 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single cell transcriptomic heterogeneity in invasive ductal and lobular breast cancer cells 94%
- Prostate cancer risk stratification via non-destructive 3D pathology with annotation-free gland segmentation and analysis 93%
- Spatiotemporal profiling defines persistence and resistance dynamics during targeted treatment of melanoma 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrative multi-omic sequencing reveals the MMTV-Myc mouse model mimics human breast cancer heterogeneity 95%
- Mutational landscape of pure ductal carcinoma in situ and associations with disease prognosis and response to radiotherapy 95%
- Automated quantification of Ki-67 expression in breast cancer from H&E-stained slides using a transformer-based regression model 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial intelligence-based histopathology image analysis identifies a novel subset of endometrial cancers with distinct genomic features and unfavourable outcome 96%
- Spatial transcriptomics reveals ovarian cancer subclones with distinct tumour microenvironments 96%
- Multiplexed RNA-FISH-guided Laser Capture Microdissection RNA Sequencing Improves Breast Cancer Molecular Subtyping, Prognostic Classification, and Predicts Response to Antibody Drug Conjugates 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systems profiling reveals recurrently dysregulated cytokine signaling responses in ER+ breast cancer patients' blood 94%
- Spatial cell graph analysis reveals skin tissue organization characteristic for cutaneous T cell lymphoma 93%
- Identifying genes underlying parallel evolution of stromal resistance to placental and cancer invasion 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.