Back

Surgical window of opportunity trial reveals mechanisms of response and resistance to navtemadlin (KRT-232) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma

Rendo, V.; Lee, E.; Bossi, C.; Khuu, N.; Rudek, M.; Pal, S.; Reynolds, A.; Fassinou, A.; Lapinskas, E.; Pisano, W.; Jeang, J.; Stopka, S.; Regan, M.; Spetz, J.; Desai, A.; Lieberman, F.; Fisher, J.; Pelton, K.; Nabors, L.; Holdhoff, M.; Danda, N.; Strowd, R.; Desideri, S.; Walbert, T.; Ye, X.; Agar, N. Y. R.; Grossman, S.; Alexander, B. M.; Wen, P. Y.; Ligon, K. L.; Beroukhim, R.

2024-08-14 oncology
10.1101/2024.08.12.24311893 medRxiv
Show abstract

We investigated the effectiveness of navtemadlin (KRT-232) in treating recurrent glioblastoma. A surgical window-of-opportunity trial (NCT03107780) was conducted on 21 patients to determine achievable drug concentrations within tumor tissue and examine mechanisms of response and resistance. Both 120 mg and 240 mg daily dosing achieved a pharmacodynamic impact. Sequencing of three recurrent tumors revealed an absence of TP53-inactivating mutations, indicating alternative mechanisms of resistance. In patient-derived GBM models, the lower range of clinically achieved navtemadlin concentrations induced partial tumor cell death as monotherapy. However, combining navtemadlin with temozolomide increased apoptotic rates while sparing normal bone marrow cells in vitro, which in return underwent reversible growth arrest. These results indicate that clinically achievable doses of navtemadlin generate significant pharmacodynamic effects and suggest that combined treatment with standard-of-care DNA damaging chemotherapy is a route to durable survival benefits. Statement of significanceTissue sampling during this clinical trial allowed us to assess mechanisms of response and resistance associated with navtemadlin treatment in recurrent GBM. We report that clinically achievable doses of navtemadlin induce pharmacodynamic effects in tumor tissue, and suggest combinations with standard-of-care chemotherapy for durable clinical benefit.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.2%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 21%
9.0%
3
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 21%
3.5%
5
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
6
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 15%
3.5%
7
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
8
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
10
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
12
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
14
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
16
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
23
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
25
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
26
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
28
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
29
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%