Automated Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using Convolutional Neural Networks: Enhancing Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Chest CT Scans
Mansoor, M.; Grindem, D. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundCoronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring is valuable for cardiovascular risk assessment but often time-consuming and subject to variability. This study aimed to develop and validate a convolutional neural network (CNN) model for automated CAC scoring in chest CT scans, potentially enhancing efficiency and accuracy. MethodsWe utilized 10,000 chest CT scans from a public dataset, split into training (n=7,000), validation (n=1,500), and testing (n=1,500) sets. A 3D CNN model based on ResNet-50 was developed and trained for CAC detection and quantification. Performance was evaluated on the test set and compared to manual scoring by three experienced radiologists. ResultsThe CNN model achieved 93.7% accuracy in detecting CAC, with 87.4% sensitivity and 92.1% specificity for identifying clinically significant CAC (Agatston score >100) in the test set (n=1,500). The model showed strong correlation with manual CAC scores (r=0.89, p<0.001). Automated scoring reduced processing time by 78% compared to manual techniques, averaging 18.3 seconds per scan. The model demonstrated consistent performance across diverse patient demographics and CT types. In a subset of patients with follow-up data (n=500), the models risk stratification was comparable to the Framingham Risk Score in predicting cardiovascular events (AUC 0.76 vs 0.74, p=0.09). ConclusionsThe CNN-based automated CAC scoring system demonstrated high accuracy and efficiency, potentially enabling more widespread cardiovascular risk assessment in routine chest CT scans. Future research should focus on prospective validation and investigation of long-term patient outcomes when integrating this technology into clinical practice.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the second-generation whole-heart motion correction algorithm (SSF2) used to demonstrate the aortic annulus on cardiac CT 95%
- AngioNet: A Convolutional Neural Network for Vessel Segmentation in X-ray Angiography 95%
- Opportunistic Assessment of Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Using Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography and Medical Record Data: a Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Designing a computer-assisted diagnosis system for cardiomegaly detection and radiology report generation 96%
- Classification of Hyper-scale Multimodal Imaging Datasets 92%
- A Comparison of CXR-CAD Software to Radiologists in Identifying COVID-19 in Individuals Evaluated for Sars CoV 2 Infection in Malawi and Zambia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep learning-based end-to-end automated stenosis classification and localization on catheter coronary angiography 96%
- Fairness in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Assessing sex and racial bias in deep learning-based segmentation 93%
- Analysis of vascular architecture and parenchymal damage generated by reduced blood perfusion in decellularized porcine kidneys using a gray level co-occurrence matrix 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 94%
- ai-corona : Radiologist-Assistant Deep Learning Framework for COVID-19 Diagnosis in Chest CT Scans 93%
- ChatGPT Provides Inconsistent Risk-Stratification of Patients With Atraumatic Chest Pain 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Auto-detection of motion artifacts on CT pulmonary angiograms with a physician-trained AI algorithm 96%
- Detection, Isolation and Quantification of Myocardial Infarct with Four Different Histological Staining Techniques 92%
- A Machine Learning Ensemble Based on Radiomics to Predict BI-RADS Category and Reduce the Biopsy Rate of Ultrasound-Detected Suspicious Breast Masses 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.