Back

The effects of food-based versus supplement-based very low-energy diets on gut microbiome composition and health outcomes in women with high body mass index (The MicroFit Study): a randomised controlled trial

Lane, M. M.; McGuinness, A. J.; Mohebbi, M.; Lotfaliany, M.; Loughman, A.; O'Hely, M.; O'Neil, A.; Batti, J.; Kotowicz, M. A.; Berk, M.; Saunders, L.; Page, R. S.; Beattie, S.; Marx, W.; Jacka, F. N.

2024-08-12 nutrition
10.1101/2024.08.11.24311823 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the effects of consuming food-based versus supplement-based very low-energy diet (VLED) programs on gut microbiome composition in women with a high body mass index (BMI). DesignAn investigator-initiated, single-blind, two-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled-feeding trial with computer-generated 1:1 randomisation. From May 2021 to February 2022, women aged 30- 65 years with BMI 30-45 kg/m2 were recruited from southwest Victoria, Australia, and randomised to a three-week food-based or supplement-based VLED program. The primary outcome was between-group differential change in faecal microbiome alpha diversity (Shannon index) from baseline to week three, assessed using shotgun metagenomics. Outcome assessors, study investigators, and analysing statisticians were blinded to group allocation until analysis completion. Allocation concealment was managed by an independent researcher using a computer software system. Modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analyses using linear mixed-effects regression models estimated mean between-group differential changes, reported as beta-coefficient point estimates ({beta}) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI), adjusted for multiple comparisons. ResultsForty-seven participants were randomised (food-based: n=23, supplement-based: n=24). Of the 45 participants analysed, there was a between-group differential change in the Shannon index (mITT {beta}: 0.37, 95%CI: 0.15 to 0.60) from baseline to week three, with a greater increase in the food-based group (mean change: 0.26, 95%CI: 0.09 to 0.44; n=23) versus supplement-based group (mean change: -0.10, 95%CI: -0.25 to 0.05; n=22). There were 27 non-serious adverse events (food-based: 8, supplement-based: 19), all non-serious. ConclusionA food-based VLED, with more whole food components and fewer highly processed industrial ingredients, increases gut microbiome diversity more than a supplement-based VLED. Summary BoxWhat is already known on this topic Dietary interventions can alter gut microbiome composition, but the impact of food processing, including in nutritionally balanced very low energy diets (VLEDs), is less understood. What this study adds This study shows that a food-based VLED, with more whole food components and fewer highly processed industrial ingredients, increases gut microbiome diversity more than a supplement-based VLED. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy. Summarise the implications of this study Our findings underscore the need for further research into how specific components and attributes of diets, both including and beyond nutritional composition, influence the gut microbiome.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
6
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
8
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
11
Food & Function
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
14
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
16
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
17
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
22
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%