Back

New tools to monitor Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and biofilms in vivo in C. elegans.

Ezcurra, M.; Ragno, M.; Xue, F.; Blackburn, S. A.; Fasseas, M.; Maitra, S.; Tholozan, F.; Thompson, R.; Sellars, L.; Hall, R.; Saunter, C.; Weinkove, D.

2024-08-09 microbiology
10.1101/2024.08.09.607303 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing health problem. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a pathogen of major concern because of its multidrug resistance and global threat, especially in health-care settings. The pathogenesis and drug resistance of P. aeruginosa depends on its ability to form biofilms, making infections chronic and untreatable as the biofilm protects against antibiotics and host immunity. A major barrier to developing new antimicrobials is the lack of in vivo biofilm models. Standard microbiological testing is usually performed in vitro using planktonic bacteria, without representation of biofilms, reducing translatability. Here we develop tools to study both infection and biofilm formation by P. aeruginosa in vivo to accelerate development of strategies targeting infection and pathogenic biofilms. Using the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and P. aeruginosa reporters combined with in vivo imaging we show that fluorescent P. aeruginosa reporters that form biofilms in vitro can be used to visualise tissue infection. Using automated tracking of C. elegans movement, we find that that the timing of this infection corresponds with a decline in health endpoints. In a mutant strain of P. aeruginosa lacking RhlR, a transcription factor that controls quorum sensing and biofilm formation, we find reduced capacity of P. aeruginosa to form biofilms, invade host tissues and negatively impact healthspan and survival. Our findings suggest that RhlR could be a new antimicrobial target to reduce P. aeruginosa biofilms and virulence in vivo and C. elegans could be used to more effectively screen for new drugs to combat antimicrobial resistance.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biofilm
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
2
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.4%
4
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.0%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
6
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
7
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
8
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.1%
9
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
11
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.8%
12
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
13
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
14
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
16
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
18
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.5%
19
ACS Infectious Diseases
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
20
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
21
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
22
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
24
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
25
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
26
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
27
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
28
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
30
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%