Advancing oncology with federated learning: transcending boundaries in breast, lung, and prostate cancer. A systematic review
Ankolekar, A.; Boie, S.; Abdollahyan, M.; Gadaleta, E.; Hasheminasab, S. A.; Yang, G.; Beauville, C.; Dikaios, N.; Kastis, G. A.; Bussmann, M.; Khalid, S.; Kruger, H.; Lambin, P.; Papanastasiou, G.
Show abstract
Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising solution to address the limitations of centralised machine learning (ML) in oncology, particularly in overcoming privacy concerns and harnessing the power of diverse, multi-center data. This systematic review synthesises current knowledge on the state-of-the-art FL in oncology, focusing on breast, lung, and prostate cancer. Distinct from previous surveys, our comprehensive review critically evaluates the real-world implementation and impact of FL on cancer care, demonstrating its effectiveness in enhancing ML generalisability, performance and data privacy in clinical settings and data. We evaluated state-of-the-art advances in FL, demonstrating its growing adoption amid tightening data privacy regulations. FL outperformed centralised ML in 15 out of the 25 studies reviewed, spanning diverse ML models and clinical applications, and facilitating integration of multi-modal information for precision medicine. Despite the current challenges identified in reproducibility, standardisation and methodology across studies, the demonstrable benefits of FL in harnessing real-world data and addressing clinical needs highlight its significant potential for advancing cancer research. We propose that future research should focus on addressing these limitations and investigating further advanced FL methods, to fully harness data diversity and realise the transformative power of cutting-edge FL in cancer care.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep ensemble multitask classification of emergency medical call incidents combining multimodal data improves emergency medical dispatch 94%
- The role of natural language processing in cancer care: a systematic scoping review with narrative synthesis 93%
- Building Large-Scale Registries from Unstructured Clinical Notes using a Low-Resource Natural Language Processing Pipeline 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Actionability of Synthetic Data in a Heterogeneous and Rare Healthcare Demographic; Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs) with Cancer 93%
- Using Adversarial Images to Assess the Stability of Deep Learning Models Trained on Diagnostic Images in Oncology 93%
- DeepPhe-CR: Natural Language Processing Software Services for Cancer Registrar Case Abstraction 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mitigating Machine Learning Bias Between High Income and Low-Middle Income Countries for Enhanced Model Fairness and Generalizability 95%
- On evaluation metrics for medical applications of artificial intelligence 94%
- Generalising uncertainty improves accuracy and safety of deep learning analytics applied to oncology 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automating the cancer registry: An Autonomous, Resource-Efficient AI for Multi-Cancer Data Abstraction from Pathology Reports 92%
- Deep neural frameworks improve the accuracy of general practitioners in the classification of pigmented skin lesions 90%
- An Explainable Web-Based Diagnostic System for Alzheimer's Disease Using XRAI and Deep Learning on Brain MRI 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.