Back

Advancing oncology with federated learning: transcending boundaries in breast, lung, and prostate cancer. A systematic review

Ankolekar, A.; Boie, S.; Abdollahyan, M.; Gadaleta, E.; Hasheminasab, S. A.; Yang, G.; Beauville, C.; Dikaios, N.; Kastis, G. A.; Bussmann, M.; Khalid, S.; Kruger, H.; Lambin, P.; Papanastasiou, G.

2024-08-09 oncology
10.1101/2024.08.08.24311681
Show abstract

Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising solution to address the limitations of centralised machine learning (ML) in oncology, particularly in overcoming privacy concerns and harnessing the power of diverse, multi-center data. This systematic review synthesises current knowledge on the state-of-the-art FL in oncology, focusing on breast, lung, and prostate cancer. Distinct from previous surveys, our comprehensive review critically evaluates the real-world implementation and impact of FL on cancer care, demonstrating its effectiveness in enhancing ML generalisability, performance and data privacy in clinical settings and data. We evaluated state-of-the-art advances in FL, demonstrating its growing adoption amid tightening data privacy regulations. FL outperformed centralised ML in 15 out of the 25 studies reviewed, spanning diverse ML models and clinical applications, and facilitating integration of multi-modal information for precision medicine. Despite the current challenges identified in reproducibility, standardisation and methodology across studies, the demonstrable benefits of FL in harnessing real-world data and addressing clinical needs highlight its significant potential for advancing cancer research. We propose that future research should focus on addressing these limitations and investigating further advanced FL methods, to fully harness data diversity and realise the transformative power of cutting-edge FL in cancer care.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
15.5%
2
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 6%
11.2%
3
npj Precision Oncology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
7.6%
4
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 28%
6.4%
5
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 3%
4.7%
6
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 5%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 72%
4.5%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
based on 141 papers
Top 4%
3.0%
9
Clinical Cancer Research
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
2.5%
10
Cancer Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
2.5%
11
JCO Precision Oncology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.9%
2.3%
12
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 5%
2.3%
13
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 13%
2.3%
14
Frontiers in Oncology
based on 34 papers
Top 4%
1.8%
15
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
based on 13 papers
Top 2%
1.8%
16
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Diagnostics
based on 36 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
18
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 18%
0.8%
19
Leukemia
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Breast Cancer Research
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
22
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
based on 36 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
23
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
24
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 12%
0.7%
25
JAMIA Open
based on 35 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
26
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Communications Medicine
based on 63 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
28
JMIR Medical Informatics
based on 16 papers
Top 5%
0.7%