Utility of thromboelastography to assess the effect of anticoagulation reversal in intracranial hemorrhage
Zepeski, A.; Faine, B. A.; Ghannam, M.; Olalde, H. M.; Wendt, L.; Naidech, A. M.; Mohr, N.; Leira, E. C.
Show abstract
BackgroundIntracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a serious complication associated with oral anticoagulant use and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although anticoagulation reversal agents are utilized as standard of care, practitioners are limited in their ability to assess degree of anticoagulation reversal for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). There is a clinical need identify biomarkers to assess anticoagulation status in patients with DOAC-associated ICH to ensure hemostatic efficacy of anticoagulation reversal agents in the acute setting. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of thromboelastography (TEG) to assess the impact of anticoagulation reversal in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with DOAC-associated ICH. MethodsWe conducted a prospective, observational cohort study in adult patients presenting to the ED with acute DOAC-associated ICH. Patients were excluded if last DOAC dose was >48 hours prior to hospital arrival, if they experienced polytrauma, were pregnant, incarcerated, had a history of hepatic failure or coagulopathy, or received anticoagulation reversal with products other than prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs). We collected baseline TEG samples from participants prior to anticoagulation reversal, as well as 30-minutes, 12-hours, and 24-hours post-reversal. TEG samples were also collected from participants who transferred to our facility after reversal at ED presentation, as well as 12- and 24-hours post-reversal. ResultsPre-reversal TEG was collected on 10 participants prior to DOAC reversal. A significant decrease in TEG R-time was observed at 30 minutes post-reversal. R-time increased at 12- and 24-hours to baseline levels. Significant changes were not observed in K-time, clot strength, maximum amplitude, or coagulation index. ConclusionsTEG R-time may be able to detect a change in anticoagulation activity of DOACs in ICH after anticoagulation reversal. R-time decreases acutely after anticoagulation reversal and rebounds at 12- and 24-hours post-reversal.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Novel Risk Assessment Model Predicts Major Bleeding Risk at Admission in Medical Inpatients 93%
- Coagulation factor XII, XI, and VIII activity levels and secondary events after first ischemic stroke 93%
- Mice with Reduced PAR4 Reactivity show Decreased Venous Thrombosis and Platelet Procoagulant Activity 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early intravenous Beta-Blockade with esmolol in adults with isolated severe Traumatic Brain Injury (EBB-TBI): protocol for a phase 2a intervention design study 91%
- Sex differences in perihematomal edema volume and outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage 91%
- C N-105 in Participants with A cute Supra T entorial Intra C erebral H emorrhage (CATCH) Trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Usage of Mineralocorticoids and Isotonic Crystalloids in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients in the United States 94%
- Impact of Fludrocortisone on the Outcomes of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients: A Retrospective Analysis 93%
- Time is Brain: Detection of Nonconvulsive Seizures and Status Epilepticus During Acute Stroke Evaluation Using Point-of-Care Electroencephalography 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pilot study to evaluate hypercoagulation and inflammation using rotational thromboelastometry and calprotectin in COVID-19 patients 95%
- The usefulness of D-dimer as a predictive marker for mortality in patients with COVID-19 hospitalized during the first wave in Italy 94%
- Incidence and Risk of Post-COVID-19 Thromboembolic Disease and the Impact of Aspirin Prescription; Nationwide Observational Cohort at the US Department of Veteran Affairs 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.