Back

Delineating Drug Class and Target-Specific Adverse Events of Kinase Inhibitors

Schweickart, A.; Somani, J.; Theisen, R.; Sahni, N.; Cichonska, A.; Rahman, R.

2024-08-08 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2024.08.07.24311573 medRxiv
Show abstract

Kinase inhibitors are a successful category of therapeutics used in treating diseases such as cancer, autoimmunity, and neurodegeneration. Despite their efficacy, these drugs often present clinically relevant adverse events that can limit their therapeutic utility or lead to their failure in clinical trials. The adverse event profile of a kinase inhibitor can be explained by its off- and on-target binding profile. Unfortunately, there are limited resources to couple inhibition of a specific kinase to clinical adverse events. Discerning which adverse events can be attributed to a specific kinase, and which are more generally caused by the kinase inhibitor drug class, is crucial for designing next-generation drugs that avoid toxicity and enhance clinical viability. By integrating adverse event incident data from the FDA Adverse Events Reporting Database with machine learning-predicted molecular binding profiles, we developed a statistical method that associates specific adverse events with potent inhibition of certain kinases. We also identify general adverse events inherent to the kinase inhibitor class. We validate our model through an extensive literature review of known kinase-adverse event pairs, comparison with the OnSIDES drug label side effect dataset, and prospective prediction of adverse events of recently approved kinase inhibitors. We show that our method can recapitulate well-established kinase-toxicity associations and identify previously unreported kinases associated with adverse events.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.