Back

Gut microbiome shifts in chronic systolic heart failure are associated with disease severity and clinical improvement

Mamic, P.; Shi, H.; Zhou, W.; Bararpour, N.; Contrepois, K.; Park, H.; Avina, M.; Rose, S. M. S.-F.; Heidenreich, P. A.; Khush, K. K.; Fowler, M. B.; Tang, W. W.; Sallam, K.; Sonnenburg, J. L.; Huang, K. C.; Snyder, M. P.

2024-08-07 microbiology
10.1101/2024.08.06.606872 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chronic systolic heart failure (HF) is a prevalent and morbid disease with marked variability in its progression and response to therapies. The gut microbiome may play a role in pathophysiology and progression of chronic HF, but clinical studies investigating relationships between the two are lacking. We analyzed the gut microbiome in a cohort of adults with chronic systolic HF caused by non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (n=59) using multi-omics profiling and, in some cases, longitudinal sampling. We identified microbiome differences compared to healthy subjects (n=50) and associated these differences with host metabolites, inflammatory markers and physiology. We found depletion of the anti-inflammatory probiotic Bifidobacterium and the associated short chain fatty acid producing and formaldehyde detoxifying pathways in the chronic HF cohort. We also discovered HF-specific microbiome-host immunome interactions. In addition to identifying several taxa and microbial pathways broadly associated with HF disease severity, we found significant links between Bifidobacterium and clinical HF improvement over time. Gut microbiome-host multi-omic data integration revealed a close association between Bifidobacterium and circulating metabolites previously implicated in cardiovascular physiology (e.g., malonic acid), thus pointing to potential mechanisms through which Bifidobacterium may affect chronic HF physiology. Our results suggest that Bifidobacterium may serve as a biomarker for chronic HF trajectory as well as suggest potential novel therapeutic interventions strategies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
4
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 7%
6.3%
5
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.4%
9
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
11
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
13
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.2%
16
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.0%
21
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%
22
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
25
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
27
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
28
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%